CLIX vs. MARB
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB).
CLIX and MARB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLIX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2017. MARB is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Feb 4, 2020.
Performance
CLIX vs. MARB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLIX vs. MARB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | -11.38% | 32.81% | 20.73% | 28.97% | -46.73% | -39.96% | 75.76% |
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.58% | 7.02% | 0.73% | 2.16% | 3.89% | 0.26% | -2.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than MARB's 0.58% return.
CLIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- -10.90%
- 1Y
- 16.33%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- -8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
MARB
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 3.13%
- 1Y
- 6.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLIX vs. MARB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MARB's 2.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CLIX vs. MARB — Risk / Return Rank
CLIX
MARB
CLIX vs. MARB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLIX | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 1.30 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 2.01 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 2.95 | -2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 20.03 | -17.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLIX | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.30 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.66 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.35 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIX and MARB is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CLIX vs. MARB - Dividend Comparison
CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than MARB's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 0.60% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 3.00% | 3.01% | 2.11% | 2.20% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CLIX vs. MARB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than MARB's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and MARB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIX | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.21% | -11.99% | -61.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.57% | -2.43% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.22% | -3.67% | -64.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.65% | 0.00% | -47.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.54% | -1.44% | -33.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.76% | 0.36% | +6.40% |
Volatility
CLIX vs. MARB - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) at 1.17%. This indicates that CLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLIX | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 1.17% | +6.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.27% | 3.18% | +13.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.90% | 5.33% | +17.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 4.23% | +22.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 5.64% | +20.39% |