CLIX vs. FTLS
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS).
CLIX and FTLS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLIX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2017. FTLS is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Sep 9, 2014.
Performance
CLIX vs. FTLS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLIX vs. FTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | -11.46% | 32.81% | 20.73% | 28.97% | -46.73% | -39.96% | 90.91% | 17.32% | 6.34% | -2.09% |
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | -0.80% | 9.09% | 18.80% | 16.94% | -5.56% | 19.65% | 2.56% | 16.16% | -4.81% | 3.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a -11.46% return, which is significantly lower than FTLS's -0.80% return.
CLIX
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.75%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
FTLS
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLIX vs. FTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FTLS's 1.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CLIX vs. FTLS — Risk / Return Rank
CLIX
FTLS
CLIX vs. FTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLIX | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 1.04 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 1.56 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 1.90 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | 8.02 | -5.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLIX | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.04 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.94 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.77 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIX and FTLS is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CLIX vs. FTLS - Dividend Comparison
CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than FTLS's 0.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 0.60% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.07% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 0.81% | 0.01% | 0.44% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 0.43% | 1.04% | 0.49% |
Drawdowns
CLIX vs. FTLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than FTLS's maximum drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and FTLS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIX | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.21% | -20.54% | -52.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.57% | -6.17% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.22% | -11.69% | -56.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.70% | -2.34% | -45.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.53% | -2.73% | -31.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 1.49% | +5.21% |
Volatility
CLIX vs. FTLS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) at 2.93%. This indicates that CLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLIX | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 2.93% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 6.53% | +9.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.94% | 10.50% | +12.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 10.65% | +16.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.04% | 11.31% | +14.73% |