CLIX vs. BFLX
CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) and BFLX (iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF) are both Long-Short funds. CLIX is passively managed, while BFLX is actively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CLIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BFLX.
Performance
CLIX vs. BFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLIX
- 1D
- 4.48%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 1Y
- 12.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- -4.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.99%
BFLX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.04M | $46.24M | $34.24M | |
| $28.27K | $42.87K | $29.25K |
CLIX vs. BFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 5.08% |
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIX and BFLX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIX vs. BFLX — Risk / Return Rank
CLIX
BFLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLIX vs. BFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIX | BFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIX vs. BFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than BFLX's maximum drawdown of -4.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and BFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIX | BFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.21% | -4.55% | -68.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.26% | -1.82% | -39.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.86% | -1.66% | -33.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.15% | — | — |
Volatility
CLIX vs. BFLX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIX | BFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 14.68% | +7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 14.68% | +12.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 14.68% | +11.21% |
CLIX vs. BFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BFLX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIX vs. BFLX - Dividend Comparison
CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while BFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 0.53% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLIX and BFLX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFLX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFLX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.
CLIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for BFLX.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CLIX and 0.40% for BFLX.
Find the right allocation for CLIX and BFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer