CLILF vs. KRC
CLILF (CapitaLand Investment Limited) and KRC (Kilroy Realty Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CLILF in Real Estate - Services, KRC in REIT - Office. Over the past 3 years, CLILF returned -5.11%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for KRC. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CLILF vs. KRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLILF achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than KRC's 4.68% return.
CLILF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 33.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- -5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KRC
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 11.67%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- -7.27%
- 10Y*
- -0.50%
CLILF vs. KRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 6.49% | -3.06% | -1.09% | -23.92% | 6.00% | -1.96% |
KRC Kilroy Realty Corporation | 4.68% | -2.00% | 7.81% | 10.09% | -39.25% | -3.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLILF and KRC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021 | -0.02 |
Fundamentals
CLILF:
SGD 0.05
KRC:
$2.32
CLILF:
52.17
KRC:
16.51
CLILF:
3.93
KRC:
4.10
CLILF:
SGD 2.91B
KRC:
$1.11B
CLILF:
SGD 2.22B
KRC:
$745.51M
CLILF:
SGD 153.89M
KRC:
$808.51M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLILF vs. KRC — Risk / Return Rank
CLILF
KRC
CLILF vs. KRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLILF | KRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 0.39 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.03 | 0.82 | +0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLILF vs. KRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLILF drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, smaller than the maximum KRC drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLILF and KRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLILF | KRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.07% | -81.27% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | -35.32% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.96% | -35.32% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.74% | -40.61% | -13.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -23.42% | -20.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.66% | 16.67% | -2.01% |
Volatility
CLILF vs. KRC - Volatility Comparison
CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) at 7.59%. This indicates that CLILF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLILF | KRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 7.59% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.59% | 22.47% | +32.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.76% | 27.82% | +34.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.89% | 33.96% | +45.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.89% | 31.59% | +48.30% |
Dividends
CLILF vs. KRC - Dividend Comparison
CLILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than KRC's 5.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 3.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KRC Kilroy Realty Corporation | 5.63% | 5.78% | 5.34% | 5.42% | 5.48% | 3.07% | 3.43% | 2.28% | 2.85% | 2.21% | 4.61% | 2.21% |
Financials
CLILF vs. KRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CapitaLand Investment Limited and Kilroy Realty Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLILF vs. KRC - Profitability Comparison
CLILF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
KRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a gross profit of 181.91M and revenue of 272.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.
CLILF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
KRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported an operating income of 67.76M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.
CLILF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.
KRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a net income of 12.42M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLILF and KRC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLILF has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to KRC (7.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLILF dropped -66.07% vs KRC's -81.27%.
KRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLILF and KRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer