PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIG.L vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLIG.L vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in City Of London Investment Group (CLIG.L) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLIG.L is traded in GBp, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CLIG.L having a 15.86% return and AAPL slightly lower at 15.16%. Over the past 10 years, CLIG.L has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 11.84%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 31.04% annualized return.


CLIG.L

1D
-1.62%
1M
6.25%
YTD
15.86%
6M
19.99%
1Y
26.64%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
11.84%

AAPL

1D
0.31%
1M
10.62%
YTD
15.16%
6M
10.31%
1Y
55.55%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
21.76%
10Y*
31.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLIG.L vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLIG.L
City Of London Investment Group
15.86%3.96%36.42%-18.22%-6.92%21.55%6.89%27.33%-1.86%28.67%
AAPL
Apple Inc
15.16%1.28%32.99%41.56%-17.65%35.92%76.95%81.77%0.22%35.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CLIG.L and AAPL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLIG.L:

£211.00M

AAPL:

$4.60T

EPS

CLIG.L:

£0.61

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

CLIG.L:

6.97

AAPL:

37.79

PEG Ratio

CLIG.L:

0.45

AAPL:

4.97

PS Ratio

CLIG.L:

1.85

AAPL:

10.26

PB Ratio

CLIG.L:

1.88

AAPL:

43.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLIG.L:

£114.62M

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLIG.L:

£102.27M

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLIG.L:

£48.99M

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLIG.L vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIG.L
CLIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CLIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIG.L vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for City Of London Investment Group (CLIG.L) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLIG.LAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.45

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.48

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.16

8.65

-3.49

CLIG.L vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIG.L and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLIG.LAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.48

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.83

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

1.08

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.94

-0.58

Drawdowns

CLIG.L vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIG.L drawdown since its inception was -63.64%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIG.L and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIG.LAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.64%

-49.37%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-16.06%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.77%

-34.64%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.07%

-34.64%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.58%

-37.00%

-3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.61%

-0.91%

-6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-10.28%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

6.44%

-1.29%

Volatility

CLIG.L vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

City Of London Investment Group (CLIG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 4.99%. This indicates that CLIG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLIG.LAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

4.99%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.98%

16.12%

+7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.01%

22.48%

+8.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.44%

26.48%

+6.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.97%

28.92%

+6.05%

Dividends

CLIG.L vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

CLIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
CLIG.L
City Of London Investment Group
7.76%8.75%8.35%10.41%11.07%6.60%6.85%9.20%7.10%6.03%8.14%6.96%

Financials

CLIG.L vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between City Of London Investment Group and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B202120222023202420252026
29.32M
111.18B
(CLIG.L) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CLIG.L values in GBp, AAPL values in USD

CLIG.L vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between City Of London Investment Group and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
78.8%
49.3%
Portfolio components
CLIG.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, City Of London Investment Group reported a gross profit of 23.11M and revenue of 29.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

CLIG.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, City Of London Investment Group reported an operating income of 10.04M and revenue of 29.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

CLIG.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, City Of London Investment Group reported a net income of 7.93M and revenue of 29.32M, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLIG.L and AAPL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLIG.L and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer