CLG.TO vs. XEI.TO
CLG.TO (iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF) and XEI.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLG.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD, while XEI.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CLG.TO returned 1.54%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for XEI.TO. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. CLG.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for XEI.TO.
Performance
CLG.TO vs. XEI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLG.TO achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than XEI.TO's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CLG.TO has underperformed XEI.TO with an annualized return of 1.54%, while XEI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.
CLG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
XEI.TO
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 23.82%
- 1Y
- 45.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.82%
- 5Y*
- 15.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
CLG.TO vs. XEI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 1.12% | 3.35% | 4.30% | 4.82% | -6.21% | -2.23% | 6.66% | 3.40% | 1.69% | -0.02% |
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF | 23.25% | 25.96% | 15.42% | 6.69% | 0.41% | 35.88% | -7.53% | 25.44% | -10.85% | 7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLG.TO and XEI.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2011 | -0.03 |
The correlation between CLG.TO and XEI.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLG.TO vs. XEI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLG.TO
XEI.TO
CLG.TO vs. XEI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLG.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 2.34 | -1.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 20.39 | -18.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 69.23 | -65.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLG.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 6.34 | -5.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 1.41 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.77 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.67 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
CLG.TO vs. XEI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLG.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.74%, smaller than the maximum XEI.TO drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLG.TO and XEI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLG.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -45.51% | +34.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -2.24% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.38% | -9.92% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.96% | -17.32% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.74% | -45.51% | +34.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | 0.00% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -5.05% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.66% | +0.11% |
Volatility
CLG.TO vs. XEI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) is 1.13%, while iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that CLG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLG.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 2.89% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.34% | 6.03% | -3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00% | 7.24% | -4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.31% | 11.24% | -6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.34% | 16.01% | -11.67% |
CLG.TO vs. XEI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLG.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XEI.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CLG.TO vs. XEI.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than XEI.TO's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.54% | 2.53% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.61% | 2.59% | 2.88% | 3.02% | 3.17% | 3.25% | 3.34% |
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF | 3.53% | 4.39% | 5.56% | 5.08% | 4.78% | 3.65% | 5.13% | 4.71% | 5.53% | 4.37% | 4.51% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLG.TO and XEI.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLG.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLG.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XEI.TO.
CLG.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while XEI.TO is Canada Equities. CLG.TO tracks Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD, while XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for CLG.TO and 0.22% for XEI.TO.
Find the right allocation for CLG.TO and XEI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer