PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLDL vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLDL vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLDL

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.38%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLDL vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLDL
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
0.00%3.74%25.41%84.75%-72.32%-17.87%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
5.36%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CLDL and XTJL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between CLDL and XTJL has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CLDL vs. XTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CLDL
XTJL

Technology

94.5%
36.2%

Healthcare

5.5%
8.4%

Communication Services

1.1%
10.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Industrials

-

8.1%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

CLDL
94.5%
XTJL
36.2%

Healthcare

CLDL
5.5%
XTJL
8.4%

Communication Services

CLDL
1.1%
XTJL
10.9%

Basic Materials

CLDL

-

XTJL
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CLDL

-

XTJL
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

CLDL

-

XTJL
4.9%

Energy

CLDL

-

XTJL
3.5%

Financial Services

CLDL

-

XTJL
11.9%

Industrials

CLDL

-

XTJL
8.1%

Real Estate

CLDL

-

XTJL
1.9%

Utilities

CLDL

-

XTJL
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLDL vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLDL

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLDL vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLDL vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLDLXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

Drawdowns

CLDL vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLDLXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

Volatility

CLDL vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLDLXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

CLDL vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLDL vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

CLDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CLDL
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
0.21%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLDL and XTJL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CLDL.

CLDL has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CLDL and 0.79% for XTJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLDL and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer