PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLDL vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLDL vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLDL vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLDL
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
0.00%3.74%25.41%43.61%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
113.23%-17.13%-29.63%-28.42%

Returns By Period


CLDL

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WTIU

1D
-11.84%
1M
17.12%
YTD
113.23%
6M
89.84%
1Y
46.84%
3Y*
2.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLDL vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLDL and WTIU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

CLDL vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLDL

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLDL vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLDL vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLDLWTIUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CLDL and WTIU is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLDL vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

CLDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
CLDL
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
0.21%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLDL vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLDLWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.53%

Volatility

CLDL vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLDLWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.54%