CLCV vs. LSVD
CLCV (Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLCV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LSVD.
Performance
CLCV vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLCV achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly lower than LSVD's 18.48% return.
CLCV
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 16.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSVD
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 6.68%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 6M
- 19.71%
- 1Y
- 44.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLCV vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLCV Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF | 14.48% | 4.88% |
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 18.48% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLCV and LSVD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLCV vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank
CLCV
LSVD
CLCV vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLCV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.96 | 1.69 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
CLCV vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLCV drawdown since its inception was -6.94%, smaller than the maximum LSVD drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCV and LSVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLCV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -19.30% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -2.46% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility
CLCV vs. LSVD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLCV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 12.76% | -0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 17.43% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 17.43% | -5.40% |
CLCV vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLCV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLCV vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison
CLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than LSVD's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CLCV Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF | 0.35% | 0.40% |
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 0.27% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLCV and LSVD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSVD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSVD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLCV.
CLCV has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.
They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCV and 0.40% for LSVD.
Find the right allocation for CLCV and LSVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer