PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLBK vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLBK vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLBK vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CLBK
Columbia Financial, Inc.
13.13%-1.71%-18.00%-10.82%3.64%34.06%-8.15%10.79%-0.84%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-3.66%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLBK achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return.


CLBK

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
13.13%
6M
19.11%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
-1.29%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.79%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLBK vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLBK
CLBK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CLBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLBK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CLBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLBK vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLBKVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.01

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

1.53

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.23

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.55

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.80

7.31

-4.51

CLBK vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLBK Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLBK and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLBKVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.01

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.71

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.83

-0.78

Correlation

The correlation between CLBK and VOO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CLBK vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CLBK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLBK
Columbia Financial, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

CLBK vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLBK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLBK and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLBKVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.68%

-33.99%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-11.98%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.68%

-24.52%

-18.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.89%

-5.55%

-17.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-3.72%

-13.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

2.55%

+3.59%

Volatility

CLBK vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK) is 4.26%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that CLBK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLBKVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

5.34%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.88%

9.47%

+12.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.55%

18.11%

+13.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.27%

16.82%

+14.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.77%

17.99%

+11.78%