PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIX vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIX vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CompX International Inc. (CIX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIX achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CIX has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 14.62%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.32% annualized return.


CIX

1D
0.23%
1M
16.32%
YTD
13.88%
6M
7.90%
1Y
16.09%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
14.62%

COST

1D
0.74%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
14.74%
6M
15.00%
1Y
0.80%
3Y*
25.17%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
22.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIX vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIX
CompX International Inc.
13.88%-3.21%14.73%43.62%-7.98%64.41%0.31%9.21%3.79%-16.21%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
14.74%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CIX and COST is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1998

0.10

Fundamentals

EPS

CIX:

$1.64

COST:

$26.51

PE Ratio

CIX:

15.77

COST:

37.22

PEG Ratio

CIX:

2.39

COST:

2.91

PS Ratio

CIX:

2.01

COST:

1.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIX:

$158.58M

COST:

$293.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIX:

$49.27M

COST:

$11.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

CIX:

$27.29M

COST:

$12.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIX vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIX
CIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIX vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CompX International Inc. (CIX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIXCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.02

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

0.05

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

0.12

+0.68

CIX vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIX and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIX vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIX drawdown since its inception was -79.14%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIX and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIXCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.14%

-53.39%

-25.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.31%

-15.14%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.85%

-20.74%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.85%

-31.40%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.85%

-31.40%

-12.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.48%

-9.84%

-6.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.00%

-13.36%

-18.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.20%

6.72%

+13.48%

Volatility

CIX vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

CompX International Inc. (CIX) has a higher volatility of 13.87% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.36%. This indicates that CIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIXCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.87%

7.36%

+6.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.10%

14.51%

+13.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.14%

18.77%

+25.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.83%

22.72%

+33.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.55%

21.96%

+32.59%

Dividends

CIX vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

CIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%, more than COST's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIX
CompX International Inc.
8.51%9.45%12.24%3.96%14.88%3.56%2.81%1.92%1.47%1.50%1.24%1.75%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.54%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Financials

CIX vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CompX International Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
40.57M
70.53B
(CIX) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CIX vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CompX International Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-30.0%-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
32.7%
-25.1%
Portfolio components
CIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CompX International Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.25M and revenue of 40.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.

CIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CompX International Inc. reported an operating income of 7.05M and revenue of 40.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

CIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CompX International Inc. reported a net income of 5.85M and revenue of 40.57M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIX and COST have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIX has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to COST (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIX dropped -79.14% vs COST's -53.39%.

CIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIX and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer