CIVVX vs. EEM
CIVVX (Causeway International Value Fund) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both funds - CIVVX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Causeway, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, CIVVX returned 10.34%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for EEM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIVVX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
CIVVX vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIVVX achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 24.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CIVVX having a 10.34% annualized return and EEM not far behind at 9.91%.
CIVVX
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
EEM
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 24.07%
- 6M
- 26.94%
- 1Y
- 45.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
CIVVX vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIVVX Causeway International Value Fund | 5.33% | 38.72% | 3.46% | 26.99% | -6.99% | 8.86% | 5.16% | 19.81% | -18.83% | 27.09% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 24.07% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIVVX and EEM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2003 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CIVVX and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIVVX vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
CIVVX
EEM
CIVVX vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIVVX | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.40 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 3.36 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 12.38 | -7.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIVVX vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIVVX drawdown since its inception was -61.07%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIVVX and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIVVX | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.07% | -66.43% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.20% | -13.52% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.31% | -17.29% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -37.49% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.13% | -39.82% | -5.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.11% | -4.12% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -16.00% | +4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 3.67% | +1.29% |
Volatility
CIVVX vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) is 5.92%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that CIVVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIVVX | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 10.80% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 19.39% | -4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.53% | 21.64% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 19.26% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 20.64% | -1.22% |
CIVVX vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIVVX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIVVX vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
CIVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than EEM's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIVVX Causeway International Value Fund | 9.11% | 9.59% | 9.07% | 3.39% | 1.54% | 1.60% | 1.11% | 4.41% | 3.31% | 1.73% | 1.69% | 1.70% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.79% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIVVX and EEM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEM has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to CIVVX (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIVVX dropped -61.07% vs EEM's -66.43%.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIVVX and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer