PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIVVX vs. CGVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIVVX vs. CGVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) and Causeway Global Value Fund (CGVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIVVX achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than CGVIX's 4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CIVVX has underperformed CGVIX with an annualized return of 10.80%, while CGVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.58% annualized return.


CIVVX

1D
-1.36%
1M
1.57%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.39%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
10.80%

CGVIX

1D
-1.25%
1M
2.20%
YTD
4.15%
6M
3.87%
1Y
24.24%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
12.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIVVX vs. CGVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIVVX
Causeway International Value Fund
5.93%38.72%3.46%26.99%-6.99%8.86%5.16%19.81%-18.83%27.09%
CGVIX
Causeway Global Value Fund
4.15%34.03%12.85%29.80%-12.06%16.44%7.39%21.26%-11.23%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CIVVX and CGVIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2008

0.93

The correlation between CIVVX and CGVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIVVX vs. CGVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIVVX
CIVVX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CIVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CIVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CGVIX
CGVIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CGVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CGVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIVVX vs. CGVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) and Causeway Global Value Fund (CGVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIVVXCGVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.80

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

6.08

-0.94

CIVVX vs. CGVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIVVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the CGVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIVVX and CGVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIVVX vs. CGVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIVVX drawdown since its inception was -61.07%, roughly equal to the maximum CGVIX drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIVVX and CGVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIVVXCGVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.07%

-62.29%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.20%

-15.00%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.31%

-26.84%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.60%

-29.26%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.13%

-44.30%

-0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-2.77%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-10.14%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

4.41%

+0.56%

Volatility

CIVVX vs. CGVIX - Volatility Comparison

Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) and Causeway Global Value Fund (CGVIX) have volatilities of 5.52% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIVVXCGVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

5.51%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.02%

13.63%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

16.26%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

22.43%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

21.93%

-2.77%

CIVVX vs. CGVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIVVX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CGVIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIVVX vs. CGVIX - Dividend Comparison

CIVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, less than CGVIX's 9.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGVIX
Causeway Global Value Fund
9.47%9.86%24.61%2.36%0.88%3.30%1.36%4.77%18.28%8.49%1.37%3.26%
CIVVX
Causeway International Value Fund
9.06%9.59%9.07%3.39%1.54%1.60%1.11%4.41%3.31%1.73%1.69%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CIVVX and CGVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CIVVX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to CGVIX (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIVVX dropped -61.07% vs CGVIX's -62.29%.

CGVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIVVX and CGVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer