CGVIX vs. CEMVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CGVIX (Causeway Global Value Fund) and CEMVX (Causeway Emerging Markets Investor) are both mutual funds - CGVIX is a Global Equities fund managed by Causeway, while CEMVX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Causeway. Over the past 10 years, CGVIX returned 12.72%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for CEMVX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGVIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for CEMVX.

Performance

CGVIX vs. CEMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway Global Value Fund (CGVIX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Investor (CEMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGVIX achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly lower than CEMVX's 36.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CGVIX having a 12.72% annualized return and CEMVX not far behind at 12.30%.

CGVIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 5.46%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: 28.19%
• 3Y*: 21.05%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

CEMVX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 8.18%
• YTD: 36.83%
• 6M: 38.72%
• 1Y: 65.88%
• 3Y*: 31.86%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: 12.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGVIX vs. CEMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGVIX Causeway Global Value Fund	5.46%	34.03%	12.85%	29.80%	-12.06%	16.44%	7.39%	21.26%	-11.23%	20.22%
CEMVX Causeway Emerging Markets Investor	36.83%	35.92%	14.62%	16.83%	-23.20%	-1.10%	16.73%	16.39%	-18.06%	39.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CGVIX and CEMVX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2008	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between CGVIX and CEMVX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CGVIX vs. CEMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGVIX

CGVIX Risk / Return Rank: 39
CGVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CGVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CGVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CGVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CGVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CEMVX

CEMVX Risk / Return Rank: 89
CEMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CEMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CEMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CEMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CEMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGVIX vs. CEMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway Global Value Fund (CGVIX) and Causeway Emerging Markets Investor (CEMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGVIX	CEMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.98	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.51	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.55	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	4.96	-3.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	18.67	-12.07

CGVIX vs. CEMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGVIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the CEMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGVIX and CEMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGVIX vs. CEMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGVIX drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, smaller than the maximum CEMVX drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVIX and CEMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGVIX	CEMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.29%	-69.02%	+6.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.00%	-13.68%	-1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.84%	-18.01%	-8.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.26%	-36.53%	+7.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.30%	-39.88%	-4.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	0.00%	-1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.15%	-15.99%	+5.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.40%	3.60%	+0.80%

Volatility

CGVIX vs. CEMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Causeway Global Value Fund (CGVIX) is 5.33%, while Causeway Emerging Markets Investor (CEMVX) has a volatility of 12.44%. This indicates that CGVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGVIX	CEMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	12.44%	-7.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.59%	20.27%	-6.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.24%	22.77%	-6.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.43%	18.35%	+4.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.06%	18.68%	+3.38%

CGVIX vs. CEMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGVIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMVX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGVIX vs. CEMVX - Dividend Comparison

CGVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, more than CEMVX's 1.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMVX Causeway Emerging Markets Investor	1.65%	2.26%	3.45%	4.55%	4.40%	22.65%	1.18%	1.79%	1.54%	1.36%	1.30%	1.48%
CGVIX Causeway Global Value Fund	9.35%	9.86%	24.61%	2.36%	0.88%	3.30%	1.36%	4.77%	18.28%	8.49%	1.37%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGVIX and CEMVX in my portfolio?

CGVIX and CEMVX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGVIX or CEMVX?

CEMVX has higher volatility (12.44%) compared to CGVIX (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGVIX dropped -62.29% vs CEMVX's -69.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.