CIUEX vs. LIAGX
CIUEX (Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, CIUEX returned 16.73%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIUEX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.
Performance
CIUEX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIUEX achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 27.78% return.
CIUEX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- —
LIAGX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 27.78%
- 6M
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- 41.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIUEX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIUEX Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund | 8.59% | 34.22% | 2.29% | 18.98% | -13.67% | 2.04% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 27.78% | 25.09% | 9.43% | 15.73% | -26.63% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIUEX and LIAGX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CIUEX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIUEX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank
CIUEX
LIAGX
CIUEX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIUEX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.82 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | 11.32 | -4.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIUEX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.99 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
CIUEX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIUEX drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, roughly equal to the maximum LIAGX drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIUEX and LIAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIUEX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.39% | -37.87% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.89% | -14.56% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.99% | -17.11% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | 0.00% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -13.24% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.62% | -0.42% |
Volatility
CIUEX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) is 5.54%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that CIUEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIUEX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 8.29% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | 18.01% | -4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 20.68% | -4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 18.79% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 18.79% | +0.23% |
CIUEX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIUEX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIUEX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison
CIUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIUEX Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund | 2.91% | 3.16% | 3.25% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 2.87% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIUEX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIAGX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to CIUEX (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIUEX dropped -37.39% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.
LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIUEX and LIAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer