PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIUEX vs. CMEUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIUEX vs. CMEUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CIUEX having a 9.31% return and CMEUX slightly higher at 9.35%.


CIUEX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.34%
YTD
9.31%
6M
9.23%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*

CMEUX

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
9.35%
6M
8.37%
1Y
26.40%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIUEX vs. CMEUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CIUEX
Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund
9.31%34.22%2.29%18.98%-13.67%14.00%5.75%4.00%
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
9.35%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CIUEX and CMEUX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019

0.72

The correlation between CIUEX and CMEUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIUEX vs. CMEUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIUEX
CIUEX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CIUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CIUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIUEX vs. CMEUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIUEXCMEUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.91

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

12.34

-4.88

CIUEX vs. CMEUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIUEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the CMEUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIUEX and CMEUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIUEX vs. CMEUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIUEX drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, which is greater than CMEUX's maximum drawdown of -28.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIUEX and CMEUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIUEXCMEUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.39%

-28.39%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.89%

-9.51%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-19.91%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

-25.61%

-4.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-2.43%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.68%

-5.31%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.23%

+0.98%

Volatility

CIUEX vs. CMEUX - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) have volatilities of 4.87% and 5.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIUEXCMEUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

5.09%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

10.30%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

12.97%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

18.05%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

19.96%

-0.94%

CIUEX vs. CMEUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIUEX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CMEUX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CIUEX vs. CMEUX - Dividend Comparison

CIUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than CMEUX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CIUEX
Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund
2.89%3.16%3.25%2.87%3.14%2.44%1.59%2.87%
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.93%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIUEX and CMEUX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMEUX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to CIUEX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIUEX dropped -37.39% vs CMEUX's -28.39%.

CMEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIUEX and CMEUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer