PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIUEX vs. BBEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIUEX vs. BBEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIUEX achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than BBEU's 6.83% return.


CIUEX

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.18%
YTD
8.23%
6M
12.29%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*

BBEU

1D
0.52%
1M
2.04%
YTD
6.83%
6M
10.61%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIUEX vs. BBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CIUEX
Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund
8.23%34.22%2.29%18.98%-13.67%14.00%5.75%18.91%-17.00%
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
6.83%36.37%1.85%20.31%-14.72%17.50%5.00%23.96%-14.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CIUEX and BBEU is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.95

The correlation between CIUEX and BBEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIUEX vs. BBEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIUEX
CIUEX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CIUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CIUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

BBEU
BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIUEX vs. BBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIUEXBBEUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

1.79

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.64

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.95

6.10

+0.85

CIUEX vs. BBEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIUEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the BBEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIUEX and BBEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIUEXBBEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.53

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.48

-0.06

Drawdowns

CIUEX vs. BBEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIUEX drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, roughly equal to the maximum BBEU drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIUEX and BBEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIUEXBBEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.39%

-36.27%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.89%

-12.23%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-14.23%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

-31.08%

+0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-1.45%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-6.14%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.28%

-0.08%

Volatility

CIUEX vs. BBEU - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) have volatilities of 5.55% and 5.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIUEXBBEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

5.80%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

12.92%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

15.46%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.48%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

19.32%

-0.30%

CIUEX vs. BBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIUEX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEU's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CIUEX vs. BBEU - Dividend Comparison

CIUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than BBEU's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
2.78%2.83%4.16%2.94%4.72%2.63%2.29%3.24%0.49%
CIUEX
Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund
2.92%3.16%3.25%2.87%3.14%2.44%1.59%2.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, CIUEX and BBEU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBEU has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to CIUEX (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIUEX dropped -37.39% vs BBEU's -36.27%.

CIUEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIUEX and BBEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer