PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIUEX vs. BGCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIUEX vs. BGCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (BGCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIUEX achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than BGCKX's 13.05% return.


CIUEX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.34%
YTD
9.31%
6M
9.23%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*

BGCKX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.44%
YTD
13.05%
6M
12.51%
1Y
23.61%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIUEX vs. BGCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CIUEX
Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund
9.31%34.22%2.29%18.98%-13.67%14.00%5.75%18.91%-17.00%
BGCKX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
13.05%18.38%21.55%14.60%1.80%3.42%0.33%-0.82%1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CIUEX and BGCKX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.07

Over the past year, CIUEX and BGCKX have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIUEX vs. BGCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIUEX
CIUEX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CIUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CIUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BGCKX
BGCKX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BGCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BGCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIUEX vs. BGCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (BGCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIUEXBGCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.65

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

7.52

-5.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

21.35

-13.89

CIUEX vs. BGCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIUEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the BGCKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIUEX and BGCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIUEX vs. BGCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIUEX drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, which is greater than BGCKX's maximum drawdown of -9.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIUEX and BGCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIUEXBGCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.39%

-9.47%

-27.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.89%

-3.23%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-4.13%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

-5.98%

-24.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.24%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.68%

-2.14%

-4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.14%

+2.07%

Volatility

CIUEX vs. BGCKX - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund (CIUEX) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (BGCKX) at 2.67%. This indicates that CIUEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIUEXBGCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

2.67%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

4.76%

+8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

7.08%

+9.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

6.57%

+11.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

5.84%

+13.18%

CIUEX vs. BGCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIUEX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BGCKX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIUEX vs. BGCKX - Dividend Comparison

CIUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than BGCKX's 7.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BGCKX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
7.93%8.96%13.25%7.49%0.00%1.22%0.34%6.80%0.96%
CIUEX
Six Circles International Unconstrained Equity Fund
2.89%3.16%3.25%2.87%3.14%2.44%1.59%2.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIUEX and BGCKX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIUEX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to BGCKX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIUEX dropped -37.39% vs BGCKX's -9.47%.

BGCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIUEX and BGCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer