CISMX vs. FTVNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX).
CISMX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Sep 15, 2015. FTVNX is managed by Fuller & Thaler Asset Mgmt. It was launched on Dec 21, 2017.
Performance
CISMX vs. FTVNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CISMX vs. FTVNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | -2.54% | -8.37% | 4.49% | 6.41% | -0.40% | 7.94% | 17.42% | 23.98% | -9.59% |
FTVNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund | -0.12% | -1.98% | 9.77% | 12.04% | -7.49% | 32.93% | 6.32% | 27.76% | -13.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CISMX achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly lower than FTVNX's -0.12% return.
CISMX
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- -5.23%
- 3Y*
- -0.23%
- 5Y*
- -1.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.07%
FTVNX
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 0.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CISMX vs. FTVNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CISMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FTVNX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CISMX vs. FTVNX — Risk / Return Rank
CISMX
FTVNX
CISMX vs. FTVNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CISMX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | 0.02 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 0.19 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.02 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 0.08 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 0.19 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CISMX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 0.02 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.27 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between CISMX and FTVNX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CISMX vs. FTVNX - Dividend Comparison
CISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than FTVNX's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 4.77% | 4.65% | 1.05% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 0.81% | 3.73% | 3.79% | 7.15% | 1.30% | 1.17% | 0.09% |
FTVNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.60% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.31% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 0.14% | 1.03% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CISMX vs. FTVNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CISMX drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum FTVNX drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISMX and FTVNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CISMX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -42.81% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.26% | -14.52% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.19% | -20.46% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.58% | -8.13% | -8.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -6.31% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 6.07% | -1.37% |
Volatility
CISMX vs. FTVNX - Volatility Comparison
Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX) at 4.58%. This indicates that CISMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTVNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CISMX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 4.58% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 12.40% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 21.23% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 18.30% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 21.77% | -3.55% |