CISMX vs. FMUEX
CISMX (Clarkston Partners Fund) and FMUEX (RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CISMX returned 6.18%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for FMUEX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CISMX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FMUEX.
Performance
CISMX vs. FMUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, CISMX has underperformed FMUEX with an annualized return of 6.18%, while FMUEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.
CISMX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- -0.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
FMUEX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 6M
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 35.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
CISMX vs. FMUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 0.00% | -8.37% | 4.49% | 6.41% | -0.40% | 7.94% | 17.42% | 23.98% | -7.25% | 12.84% |
FMUEX RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund | 17.89% | 12.79% | 8.09% | 17.10% | -10.47% | 31.75% | 5.65% | 22.44% | -11.62% | 13.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CISMX and FMUEX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CISMX and FMUEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CISMX vs. FMUEX — Risk / Return Rank
CISMX
FMUEX
CISMX vs. FMUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CISMX | FMUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.44 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 4.73 | -4.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.45 | 17.06 | -16.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CISMX vs. FMUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CISMX drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum FMUEX drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISMX and FMUEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CISMX | FMUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -58.03% | +24.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -7.61% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.19% | -25.49% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.19% | -25.49% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -42.31% | +8.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.41% | -0.76% | -13.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -8.05% | +1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 2.10% | +2.69% |
Volatility
CISMX vs. FMUEX - Volatility Comparison
Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) at 4.44%. This indicates that CISMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CISMX | FMUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 4.44% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 10.24% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 14.46% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 18.41% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 19.76% | -1.45% |
CISMX vs. FMUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CISMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUEX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
CISMX vs. FMUEX - Dividend Comparison
CISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than FMUEX's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 4.65% | 4.65% | 1.05% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 0.81% | 3.73% | 3.79% | 7.15% | 1.30% | 1.17% | 0.09% |
FMUEX RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund | 1.59% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 4.12% | 8.26% | 4.38% | 1.61% | 5.57% | 5.88% | 3.80% | 4.80% | 8.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CISMX and FMUEX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CISMX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to FMUEX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CISMX dropped -33.80% vs FMUEX's -58.03%.
FMUEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CISMX and FMUEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer