CIPSX vs. EMCAX
CIPSX (Champlain Small Company Fund) and EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CIPSX returned 7.18%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for EMCAX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIPSX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for EMCAX.
Performance
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIPSX achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than EMCAX's 11.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPSX has underperformed EMCAX with an annualized return of 7.18%, while EMCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return.
CIPSX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- -16.12%
- 1Y
- -19.45%
- 3Y*
- 1.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
EMCAX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.56%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPSX Champlain Small Company Fund | 3.44% | -22.88% | 23.09% | 14.01% | -20.83% | 12.37% | 24.14% | 25.02% | -3.35% | 10.56% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 11.03% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 16.07% | 27.81% | 19.10% | -4.64% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIPSX and EMCAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2004 | 0.83 |
The correlation between CIPSX and EMCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIPSX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank
CIPSX
EMCAX
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Small Company Fund (CIPSX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIPSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.21 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 1.98 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 7.46 | -8.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIPSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 1.20 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.24 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.53 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.46 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIPSX drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPSX and EMCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIPSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.42% | -51.81% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.56% | -8.60% | -22.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.27% | -19.19% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.62% | -30.60% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.09% | -42.79% | +6.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.28% | -2.58% | -20.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.45% | -13.27% | +4.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.65% | 2.28% | +14.37% |
Volatility
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Champlain Small Company Fund (CIPSX) is 4.02%, while Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that CIPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIPSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 4.64% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.17% | 11.27% | +12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.98% | 14.15% | +11.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.53% | 18.17% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 20.24% | +1.58% |
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIPSX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison
CIPSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPSX Champlain Small Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.74% | 6.39% | 0.36% | 4.45% | 6.11% | 7.96% | 13.29% | 9.78% | 2.72% | 2.67% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIPSX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMCAX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to CIPSX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPSX dropped -46.42% vs EMCAX's -51.81%.
EMCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIPSX and EMCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer