CIPSX vs. EMCAX
CIPSX (Champlain Small Company Fund) and EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CIPSX returned 7.47%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for EMCAX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIPSX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for EMCAX.
Performance
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIPSX achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMCAX's 12.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPSX has underperformed EMCAX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while EMCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.18% annualized return.
CIPSX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- -18.68%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- -1.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
EMCAX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPSX Champlain Small Company Fund | 4.39% | -22.88% | 23.09% | 14.01% | -20.83% | 12.37% | 24.14% | 25.02% | -3.35% | 10.56% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 12.72% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 16.07% | 27.81% | 19.10% | -4.64% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIPSX and EMCAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2004 | 0.83 |
The correlation between CIPSX and EMCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIPSX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank
CIPSX
EMCAX
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Small Company Fund (CIPSX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIPSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.21 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 2.06 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 7.70 | -8.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIPSX drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPSX and EMCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIPSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.42% | -51.81% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.56% | -8.60% | -22.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.27% | -19.19% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.62% | -30.60% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.09% | -42.79% | +6.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.58% | -1.94% | -20.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -13.25% | +4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.38% | 2.30% | +15.08% |
Volatility
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison
Champlain Small Company Fund (CIPSX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 4.07%. This indicates that CIPSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIPSX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 4.07% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 11.56% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.21% | 14.50% | +11.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 18.19% | +4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 20.21% | +1.61% |
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIPSX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIPSX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison
CIPSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPSX Champlain Small Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.74% | 6.39% | 0.36% | 4.45% | 6.11% | 7.96% | 13.29% | 9.78% | 2.72% | 2.67% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIPSX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIPSX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to EMCAX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPSX dropped -46.42% vs EMCAX's -51.81%.
EMCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIPSX and EMCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer