CIPMX vs. SSMHX
CIPMX (Champlain Mid Cap Fund) and SSMHX (State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CIPMX returned 9.76%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for SSMHX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIPMX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SSMHX.
Performance
CIPMX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIPMX achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than SSMHX's 15.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPMX has underperformed SSMHX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while SSMHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.
CIPMX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 6M
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- -1.76%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
SSMHX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
CIPMX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund | -2.90% | 1.44% | 13.94% | 15.40% | -26.53% | 24.48% | 29.03% | 26.27% | 3.41% | 13.62% |
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 15.05% | 12.90% | 10.73% | 25.21% | -25.43% | 13.08% | 32.46% | 28.00% | -9.21% | 18.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIPMX and SSMHX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015 | 0.89 |
The correlation between CIPMX and SSMHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIPMX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank
CIPMX
SSMHX
CIPMX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIPMX | SSMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 3.08 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 11.10 | -11.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIPMX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIPMX drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, which is greater than SSMHX's maximum drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPMX and SSMHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIPMX | SSMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.33% | -41.61% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -10.03% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.11% | -30.38% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.20% | -34.84% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.84% | -41.61% | +7.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.84% | -0.11% | -6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -9.10% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | 2.78% | +3.05% |
Volatility
CIPMX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) is 5.11%, while State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that CIPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIPMX | SSMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 5.97% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 13.16% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 17.56% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 22.52% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 22.44% | -3.55% |
CIPMX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIPMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIPMX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison
CIPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.72%, more than SSMHX's 6.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPMX Champlain Mid Cap Fund | 18.72% | 18.17% | 15.31% | 0.30% | 1.44% | 10.24% | 4.62% | 4.06% | 6.70% | 0.00% | 4.28% | 8.32% |
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 6.19% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 2.31% | 16.30% | 2.91% | 3.65% | 6.43% | 4.01% | 1.71% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIPMX and SSMHX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSMHX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to CIPMX (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPMX dropped -45.33% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.
SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIPMX and SSMHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer