PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIPMX vs. BFGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIPMX vs. BFGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIPMX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than BFGIX's 1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPMX has underperformed BFGIX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while BFGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.20% annualized return.


CIPMX

1D
-0.35%
1M
7.54%
YTD
0.20%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
9.76%

BFGIX

1D
-1.89%
1M
6.02%
YTD
1.95%
6M
13.06%
1Y
22.30%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
13.09%
10Y*
21.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIPMX vs. BFGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIPMX
Champlain Mid Cap Fund
0.20%1.44%13.94%15.40%-26.53%24.48%29.03%26.27%3.41%13.62%
BFGIX
Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares
1.95%22.26%29.85%27.78%-28.05%19.00%122.92%30.34%4.08%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CIPMX and BFGIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2009

0.82

The correlation between CIPMX and BFGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIPMX vs. BFGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIPMX
CIPMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CIPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CIPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BFGIX
BFGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BFGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BFGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIPMX vs. BFGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIPMXBFGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.05

1.20

-1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.18

2.20

-2.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.25

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

2.37

-2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.14

6.40

-6.26

CIPMX vs. BFGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIPMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the BFGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIPMX and BFGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIPMXBFGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

1.20

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.59

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.89

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.78

-0.29

Drawdowns

CIPMX vs. BFGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIPMX drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BFGIX drawdown of -43.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPMX and BFGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIPMXBFGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.33%

-43.62%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.68%

-9.69%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-20.97%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.20%

-35.71%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.84%

-43.62%

+9.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-1.89%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-7.87%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

3.57%

+2.10%

Volatility

CIPMX vs. BFGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Champlain Mid Cap Fund (CIPMX) is 4.01%, while Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that CIPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIPMXBFGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

5.17%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

15.66%

-4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

19.06%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

22.36%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

23.99%

-5.12%

CIPMX vs. BFGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIPMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BFGIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIPMX vs. BFGIX - Dividend Comparison

CIPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.14%, while BFGIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFGIX
Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.79%15.01%2.78%1.74%1.05%2.07%5.92%6.01%
CIPMX
Champlain Mid Cap Fund
18.14%18.17%15.31%0.30%1.44%10.24%4.62%4.06%6.70%0.00%4.28%8.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIPMX and BFGIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFGIX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to CIPMX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPMX dropped -45.33% vs BFGIX's -43.62%.

BFGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIPMX and BFGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer