PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CINF vs. ABBV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CINFABBV
YTD Return46.60%33.45%
1Y Return54.19%49.82%
3Y Return (Ann)9.05%24.65%
5Y Return (Ann)9.36%23.79%
10Y Return (Ann)14.56%16.84%
Sharpe Ratio2.482.37
Sortino Ratio3.193.14
Omega Ratio1.451.43
Calmar Ratio1.972.88
Martin Ratio15.699.40
Ulcer Index3.38%4.85%
Daily Std Dev21.36%19.27%
Max Drawdown-59.64%-45.09%
Current Drawdown-0.66%-2.14%

Fundamentals


CINFABBV
Market Cap$23.24B$352.54B
EPS$19.67$2.87
PE Ratio7.5669.51
PEG Ratio-158.720.47
Total Revenue (TTM)$12.15B$55.53B
Gross Profit (TTM)$12.12B$42.72B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.47B$26.35B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CINF and ABBV is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CINF vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a 46.60% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's 33.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 14.56%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.84% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
430.27%
822.44%
CINF
ABBV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CINF vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CINF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CINF, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CINF, currently valued at 3.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CINF, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CINF, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.97
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CINF, currently valued at 15.69, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.69
ABBV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 2.88, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.88
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ABBV, currently valued at 9.40, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.40

CINF vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CINF Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CINF and ABBV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.48
2.37
CINF
ABBV

Dividends

CINF vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than ABBV's 3.11% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
2.14%2.90%2.70%2.21%2.75%2.13%2.74%3.33%2.53%3.89%3.40%3.16%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.11%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%2.54%3.03%

Drawdowns

CINF vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and ABBV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.66%
-2.14%
CINF
ABBV

Volatility

CINF vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) at 7.34%. This indicates that CINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.76%
7.34%
CINF
ABBV

Financials

CINF vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items