CINF vs. ABBV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV).

Performance

CINF vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CINF vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	-3.09%	16.27%	42.48%	4.00%	-7.89%	33.28%	-14.15%	38.87%	6.25%	2.34%
ABBV AbbVie Inc.	-4.05%	33.08%	18.86%	-0.23%	24.01%	32.43%	27.72%	1.47%	-0.96%	60.07%

Fundamentals

EPS CINF : $22.75 ABBV : $2.38
PE Ratio CINF : 6.92 ABBV : 91.23
PS Ratio CINF : 1.31 ABBV : 6.30
Total Revenue (TTM) CINF : $12.63B ABBV : $61.16B
Gross Profit (TTM) CINF : $4.37B ABBV : $44.85B
EBITDA (TTM) CINF : $2.31B ABBV : $28.29B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CINF achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's -4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CINF has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 12.03%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.07% annualized return.

CINF

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -3.48%
• YTD: -3.09%
• 6M: 0.64%
• 1Y: 8.96%
• 3Y*: 14.85%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

ABBV

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -6.29%
• YTD: -4.05%
• 6M: -4.63%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 19.40%
• 10Y*: 19.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CINF vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CINF

CINF Risk / Return Rank: 55
CINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CINF Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CINF Martin Ratio Rank: 64

ABBV

ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 50
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CINF vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CINF	ABBV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	0.27	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	0.54	+0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.07	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	0.53	+0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.39	1.17	+1.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CINF vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CINF Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CINF and ABBV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CINF	ABBV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	0.27	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.86	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.74	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.74	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between CINF and ABBV is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CINF vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than ABBV's 3.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	2.26%	2.13%	2.25%	2.90%	2.70%	2.21%	2.75%	2.13%	2.74%	3.33%	2.53%	3.89%
ABBV AbbVie Inc.	3.06%	2.87%	3.49%	3.82%	3.49%	3.84%	4.41%	4.83%	3.89%	2.65%	3.64%	3.41%

Drawdowns

CINF vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and ABBV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CINF	ABBV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-45.09%	-14.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.22%	-16.74%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.77%	-21.92%	-13.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.12%	-45.09%	-13.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.32%	-9.64%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-10.70%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	8.12%	-3.70%

Volatility

CINF vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) is 5.87%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that CINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CINF	ABBV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.87%	7.57%	-1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.33%	19.03%	-4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.65%	27.12%	-3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.75%	22.61%	+3.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.78%	25.71%	+3.07%

Financials

CINF vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CINF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.96B and revenue of 16.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.0%.

CINF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 5.81B and revenue of 16.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

CINF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 676.00M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 1.82B and revenue of 16.62B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.