CINF vs. HRL
CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) and HRL (Hormel Foods Corporation) are both stocks. CINF operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while HRL operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, CINF returned 11.95%/yr vs -1.18%/yr for HRL. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CINF vs. HRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CINF having a 10.03% return and HRL slightly lower at 9.69%. Over the past 10 years, CINF has outperformed HRL with an annualized return of 11.95%, while HRL has yielded a comparatively lower -1.18% annualized return.
CINF
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.07%
HRL
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- -11.32%
- 5Y*
- -8.56%
- 10Y*
- -1.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $158.60M | $174.30M | $143.71M | |
| $92.12M | $94.55M | $119.06M |
CINF vs. HRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 10.03% | 16.27% | 42.48% | 4.00% | -7.89% | 33.28% | -14.15% | 38.87% | 6.25% | 2.34% |
HRL Hormel Foods Corporation | 9.69% | -21.27% | 1.21% | -27.49% | -4.67% | 6.99% | 5.38% | 7.85% | 19.68% | 6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINF and HRL is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
CINF:
$27.27B
HRL:
$13.76B
CINF:
$28.19
HRL:
$0.85
CINF:
6.30
HRL:
29.50
CINF:
1.50
HRL:
1.13
CINF:
$13.95B
HRL:
$12.22B
CINF:
$4.91B
HRL:
$1.92B
CINF:
$2.73B
HRL:
$868.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINF vs. HRL — Risk / Return Rank
CINF
HRL
CINF vs. HRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) and Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CINF | HRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.99 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | -0.21 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | -0.36 | +5.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CINF vs. HRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINF drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, roughly equal to the maximum HRL drawdown of -58.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINF and HRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINF | HRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -58.46% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -29.82% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -46.94% | +26.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.77% | -58.46% | +22.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.12% | -58.46% | +0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.47% | -46.75% | +39.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -12.00% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 17.70% | -13.33% |
Volatility
CINF vs. HRL - Volatility Comparison
Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) at 6.95%. This indicates that CINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINF | HRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 6.95% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.07% | 21.46% | -4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.21% | 30.32% | -9.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.76% | 24.45% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.97% | 23.45% | +5.52% |
Dividends
CINF vs. HRL - Dividend Comparison
CINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than HRL's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.04% | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% |
HRL Hormel Foods Corporation | 4.67% | 4.89% | 3.60% | 3.43% | 2.28% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 1.87% | 1.67% | 1.26% |
Financials
CINF vs. HRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Hormel Foods Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CINF vs. HRL - Profitability Comparison
CINF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.51M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
CINF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
HRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 217.11M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
CINF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 4.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.4%.
HRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a net income of 157.50M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CINF and HRL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CINF has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to HRL (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CINF dropped -59.64% vs HRL's -58.46%.
CINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CINF and HRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer