CIMDX vs. FTVNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX).
CIMDX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Jan 31, 2017. FTVNX is managed by Fuller & Thaler Asset Mgmt. It was launched on Dec 21, 2017.
Performance
CIMDX vs. FTVNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIMDX vs. FTVNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | -4.82% | 7.35% | 5.67% | 10.38% | -3.67% | 6.23% | 23.21% | 23.74% | -10.28% |
FTVNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund | -0.12% | -1.98% | 9.77% | 12.04% | -7.49% | 32.93% | 6.32% | 27.76% | -13.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIMDX achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly lower than FTVNX's -0.12% return.
CIMDX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.41%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FTVNX
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 0.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIMDX vs. FTVNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FTVNX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIMDX vs. FTVNX — Risk / Return Rank
CIMDX
FTVNX
CIMDX vs. FTVNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIMDX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | 0.02 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.40 | 0.19 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.02 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 0.08 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 0.19 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIMDX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 0.02 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.27 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.32 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIMDX and FTVNX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CIMDX vs. FTVNX - Dividend Comparison
CIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than FTVNX's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund | 3.41% | 3.24% | 0.45% | 1.62% | 6.38% | 0.44% | 0.91% | 3.32% | 2.27% | 0.41% |
FTVNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.60% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.31% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 0.14% | 1.03% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CIMDX vs. FTVNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIMDX drawdown since its inception was -31.86%, smaller than the maximum FTVNX drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIMDX and FTVNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIMDX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.86% | -42.81% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -14.52% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.26% | -20.46% | -0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.41% | -8.13% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -6.31% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 6.07% | -2.47% |
Volatility
CIMDX vs. FTVNX - Volatility Comparison
Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Value Fund (FTVNX) at 4.58%. This indicates that CIMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTVNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIMDX | FTVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 4.58% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.49% | 12.40% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 21.23% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 18.30% | -2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 21.77% | -4.25% |