PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIL vs. TIER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIL vs. TIER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) and T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIL achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than TIER's 15.54% return.


CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
6M
8.27%
1Y
16.20%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
8.21%

TIER

1D
1.10%
1M
5.68%
YTD
15.54%
6M
18.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIL vs. TIER - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CIL and TIER is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.64

CIL vs. TIER - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CIL
TIER

Financial Services

24.8%
24.5%

Industrials

18.4%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
7.9%

Healthcare

7.7%
6.3%

Utilities

6.6%
2.7%

Basic Materials

6.6%
7.5%

Technology

6.4%
20.2%

Communication Services

5.8%
5.4%

Energy

4.6%
5.8%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.3%

Financial Services

CIL
24.8%
TIER
24.5%

Industrials

CIL
18.4%
TIER
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

CIL
8.8%
TIER
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CIL
8.2%
TIER
7.9%

Healthcare

CIL
7.7%
TIER
6.3%

Utilities

CIL
6.6%
TIER
2.7%

Basic Materials

CIL
6.6%
TIER
7.5%

Technology

CIL
6.4%
TIER
20.2%

Communication Services

CIL
5.8%
TIER
5.4%

Energy

CIL
4.6%
TIER
5.8%

Real Estate

CIL
2.2%
TIER
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIL vs. TIER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

TIER
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIL vs. TIER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) and T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CILTIERDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.62

CIL vs. TIER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CILTIERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

2.08

-1.65

Drawdowns

CIL vs. TIER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIL drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, which is greater than TIER's maximum drawdown of -12.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIL and TIER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CILTIERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-12.07%

-24.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

0.00%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-1.78%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

Volatility

CIL vs. TIER - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CILTIERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.26%

15.61%

-7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

15.61%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

15.61%

+1.57%

CIL vs. TIER - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TIER's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIL vs. TIER - Dividend Comparison

CIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than TIER's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
1.67%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%
TIER
T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF
0.64%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIL and TIER have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TIER is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIER is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

CIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.64% for TIER.

They also come from different issuers: Crestview and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CIL and 0.38% for TIER.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIL and TIER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer