PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIL vs. AVIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIL vs. AVIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) and Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIL achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than AVIV's 12.39% return.


CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
6M
8.27%
1Y
16.20%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
8.21%

AVIV

1D
0.78%
1M
2.74%
YTD
12.39%
6M
16.38%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIL vs. AVIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
5.44%32.99%3.76%16.29%-16.00%3.04%
AVIV
Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF
12.39%41.80%4.30%18.47%-8.26%1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CIL and AVIV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.79

The correlation between CIL and AVIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CIL vs. AVIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CIL
AVIV

Financial Services

24.8%
27.5%

Industrials

18.4%
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
10.2%

Healthcare

7.7%
4.8%

Utilities

6.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

6.6%
12.4%

Technology

6.4%
3.5%

Communication Services

5.8%
4.6%

Energy

4.6%
14.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.0%

Financial Services

CIL
24.8%
AVIV
27.5%

Industrials

CIL
18.4%
AVIV
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

CIL
8.8%
AVIV
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CIL
8.2%
AVIV
10.2%

Healthcare

CIL
7.7%
AVIV
4.8%

Utilities

CIL
6.6%
AVIV
1.1%

Basic Materials

CIL
6.6%
AVIV
12.4%

Technology

CIL
6.4%
AVIV
3.5%

Communication Services

CIL
5.8%
AVIV
4.6%

Energy

CIL
4.6%
AVIV
14.2%

Real Estate

CIL
2.2%
AVIV
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIL vs. AVIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AVIV
AVIV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AVIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AVIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIL vs. AVIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) and Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CILAVIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

2.32

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

3.17

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.43

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

3.16

+1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.62

12.49

+6.14

CIL vs. AVIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the AVIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIL and AVIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CILAVIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.32

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.83

-0.40

Drawdowns

CIL vs. AVIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIL drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, which is greater than AVIV's maximum drawdown of -27.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIL and AVIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CILAVIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-27.69%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-10.78%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

-14.13%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.60%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-5.12%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

2.73%

-1.66%

Volatility

CIL vs. AVIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) is 0.00%, while Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that CIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CILAVIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.49%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

11.71%

-7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.26%

14.10%

-5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

16.89%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.89%

+0.29%

CIL vs. AVIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AVIV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIL vs. AVIV - Dividend Comparison

CIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than AVIV's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVIV
Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF
2.80%3.01%3.46%3.64%2.84%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
1.67%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIL and AVIV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVIV has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIL dropped -36.27% vs AVIV's -27.69%.

On 3-year performance, AVIV leads with 22.49% vs 15.59% for CIL. On fees, AVIV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVIV has performed better with a 22.49% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVIV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

AVIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while AVIV tracks MSCI World ex-U.S. Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CIL and 0.25% for AVIV.

AVIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIL and AVIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer