CIL vs. AVIV
CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) and AVIV (Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index while AVIV tracks the MSCI World ex-U.S. Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CIL returned 15.59%/yr vs 22.49%/yr for AVIV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVIV.
Performance
CIL vs. AVIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIL achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than AVIV's 12.39% return.
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 16.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
AVIV
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIL vs. AVIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 5.44% | 32.99% | 3.76% | 16.29% | -16.00% | 3.04% |
AVIV Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF | 12.39% | 41.80% | 4.30% | 18.47% | -8.26% | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIL and AVIV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between CIL and AVIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CIL vs. AVIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIL
AVIV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
CIL
AVIV
Industrials
CIL
AVIV
Consumer Defensive
CIL
AVIV
Consumer Cyclical
CIL
AVIV
Healthcare
CIL
AVIV
Utilities
CIL
AVIV
Basic Materials
CIL
AVIV
Technology
CIL
AVIV
Communication Services
CIL
AVIV
Energy
CIL
AVIV
Real Estate
CIL
AVIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIL vs. AVIV — Risk / Return Rank
CIL
AVIV
CIL vs. AVIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) and Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIL | AVIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 2.32 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 3.17 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.43 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 3.16 | +1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.62 | 12.49 | +6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIL | AVIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.32 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.83 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
CIL vs. AVIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIL drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, which is greater than AVIV's maximum drawdown of -27.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIL and AVIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIL | AVIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.27% | -27.69% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -10.78% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.96% | -14.13% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.60% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -5.12% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 2.73% | -1.66% |
Volatility
CIL vs. AVIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) is 0.00%, while Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that CIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIL | AVIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 4.49% | -4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.42% | 11.71% | -7.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 14.10% | -5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 16.89% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 16.89% | +0.29% |
CIL vs. AVIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AVIV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIL vs. AVIV - Dividend Comparison
CIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than AVIV's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVIV Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF | 2.80% | 3.01% | 3.46% | 3.64% | 2.84% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.67% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIL and AVIV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVIV has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIL dropped -36.27% vs AVIV's -27.69%.
On 3-year performance, AVIV leads with 22.49% vs 15.59% for CIL. On fees, AVIV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVIV has performed better with a 22.49% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVIV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.
AVIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.
CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index, while AVIV tracks MSCI World ex-U.S. Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CIL and 0.25% for AVIV.
AVIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIL and AVIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer