PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CII vs. BGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CII vs. BGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc. (CII) and BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CII achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly lower than BGR's 25.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CII has outperformed BGR with an annualized return of 14.71%, while BGR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.


CII

1D
1.66%
1M
-3.96%
6M
8.55%
YTD
9.34%
1Y
34.62%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
14.71%
ALL TIME*
10.64%

BGR

1D
-1.33%
1M
9.82%
6M
17.24%
YTD
25.95%
1Y
33.44%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
21.04%
10Y*
8.92%
ALL TIME*
6.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.27M$1.36M$1.62M
$2.75M$2.23M$1.91M

CII vs. BGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc.
9.34%37.78%12.70%18.47%-13.21%34.26%8.11%30.46%-8.60%27.73%
BGR
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust
25.95%17.34%8.07%5.73%38.90%40.25%-34.78%23.32%-21.21%5.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CII and BGR is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2004

0.46

The correlation between CII and BGR shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CII:

$1.00B

BGR:

$415.70M

EPS

CII:

$7.09

BGR:

$2.14

PE Ratio

CII:

3.46

BGR:

7.62

PEG Ratio

CII:

0.11

BGR:

0.25

PS Ratio

CII:

5.43

BGR:

12.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

CII:

$185.01M

BGR:

$34.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CII:

$49.60M

BGR:

$32.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

CII:

$332.49M

BGR:

$37.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CII vs. BGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CII
CII Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CII Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CII Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CII Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CII Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BGR
BGR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CII vs. BGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc. (CII) and BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIIBGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.32

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

6.87

+2.92

CII vs. BGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CII Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the BGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CII and BGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CII vs. BGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CII drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, smaller than the maximum BGR drawdown of -72.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CII and BGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIIBGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.43%

-72.74%

+16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-14.50%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-18.25%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

-24.81%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-66.16%

+25.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-3.79%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-20.15%

+13.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

4.88%

-1.34%

Volatility

CII vs. BGR - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc. (CII) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) at 5.58%. This indicates that CII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIIBGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

5.58%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

17.85%

-4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

20.67%

-3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

22.60%

-5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

26.86%

-8.18%

Dividends

CII vs. BGR - Dividend Comparison

CII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.87%, more than BGR's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGR
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust
7.15%8.62%6.66%6.22%4.62%4.75%9.26%7.84%8.91%6.57%6.90%11.93%
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc.
15.87%16.65%6.15%6.28%12.27%4.98%6.03%5.79%7.06%6.07%8.38%8.49%

Financials

CII vs. BGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc. and BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CII and BGR have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CII has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to BGR (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CII dropped -56.43% vs BGR's -72.74%.

CII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CII and BGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer