BGR vs. IXC
BGR (BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust) is a stock, while IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, BGR returned 8.56%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for IXC. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
BGR vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGR achieves a 22.44% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 32.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BGR has underperformed IXC with an annualized return of 8.56%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.29% annualized return.
BGR
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- 22.44%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 37.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 17.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 32.22%
- 6M
- 30.00%
- 1Y
- 48.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.84%
- 5Y*
- 19.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
BGR vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGR BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust | 22.44% | 17.34% | 8.07% | 5.73% | 38.90% | 40.25% | -34.78% | 23.32% | -21.21% | 5.18% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 32.22% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGR and IXC is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2004 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BGR and IXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGR vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
BGR
IXC
BGR vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGR | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 2.58 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 3.25 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 5.00 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.91 | 15.10 | -3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGR | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.58 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.84 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.38 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.32 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
BGR vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGR drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGR and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGR | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.74% | -67.88% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -9.66% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.25% | -19.06% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -24.93% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.16% | -64.16% | -2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -4.84% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.25% | -17.48% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 3.20% | -0.02% |
Volatility
BGR vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) have volatilities of 7.41% and 7.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGR | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 7.50% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.41% | 15.42% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.50% | 18.75% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 23.50% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 26.85% | 0.00% |
Dividends
BGR vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
BGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than IXC's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGR BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust | 7.27% | 8.62% | 6.66% | 6.22% | 4.62% | 4.75% | 9.26% | 7.84% | 8.91% | 6.57% | 6.90% | 11.93% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.79% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGR and IXC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to BGR (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGR dropped -72.74% vs IXC's -67.88%.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGR and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer