PortfoliosLab logo
BGR vs. XFLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BGR and XFLT is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BGR vs. XFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BGR:

0.16

XFLT:

-0.44

Sortino Ratio

BGR:

0.38

XFLT:

-0.45

Omega Ratio

BGR:

1.05

XFLT:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

BGR:

0.22

XFLT:

-0.31

Martin Ratio

BGR:

0.81

XFLT:

-0.95

Ulcer Index

BGR:

4.88%

XFLT:

7.43%

Daily Std Dev

BGR:

20.46%

XFLT:

16.41%

Max Drawdown

BGR:

-72.56%

XFLT:

-55.42%

Current Drawdown

BGR:

-6.75%

XFLT:

-14.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BGR:

$325.84M

XFLT:

$435.39M

EPS

BGR:

$0.48

XFLT:

$1.01

PE Ratio

BGR:

26.00

XFLT:

5.66

PS Ratio

BGR:

24.42

XFLT:

6.80

PB Ratio

BGR:

0.91

XFLT:

0.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

BGR:

$34.81M

XFLT:

$45.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BGR:

$32.60M

XFLT:

$37.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

BGR:

$14.11M

XFLT:

$22.13M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGR achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly higher than XFLT's -9.38% return.


BGR

YTD

4.22%

1M

10.06%

6M

-1.96%

1Y

3.19%

5Y*

20.89%

10Y*

2.17%

XFLT

YTD

-9.38%

1M

8.27%

6M

-11.86%

1Y

-7.18%

5Y*

17.58%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BGR vs. XFLT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BGR is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BGR is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BGR is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BGR is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BGR is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BGR is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XFLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XFLT is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XFLT is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XFLT is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XFLT is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XFLT is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XFLT is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BGR vs. XFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the XFLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGR and XFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BGR vs. XFLT - Dividend Comparison

BGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, while XFLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BGR
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust
7.57%6.66%6.22%4.62%4.75%9.26%7.84%8.91%6.57%6.90%11.93%13.83%
XFLT
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BGR vs. XFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGR drawdown since its inception was -72.56%, which is greater than XFLT's maximum drawdown of -55.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGR and XFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BGR vs. XFLT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) at 4.45%. This indicates that BGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BGR vs. XFLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20212022202320242025
10.63M
45.00M
(BGR) Total Revenue
(XFLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items