BGR vs. XFLT
BGR (BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust) and XFLT (XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BGR in Asset Management, XFLT in Capital Markets. Over the past 5 years, BGR returned 15.67%/yr vs -5.93%/yr for XFLT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGR vs. XFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGR achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than XFLT's -22.23% return.
BGR
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -8.23%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
XFLT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- -22.23%
- 6M
- -19.20%
- 1Y
- -27.04%
- 3Y*
- -6.60%
- 5Y*
- -5.93%
- 10Y*
- —
BGR vs. XFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGR BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust | 14.53% | 17.34% | 8.07% | 5.73% | 38.90% | 40.25% | -34.78% | 23.32% | -21.21% | 5.44% |
XFLT XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | -22.23% | -15.35% | 7.37% | 30.40% | -20.30% | 31.30% | 5.13% | 22.05% | -15.10% | -4.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGR and XFLT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between BGR and XFLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BGR:
$380.32M
XFLT:
$261.51M
BGR:
$2.14
XFLT:
-$3.38
BGR:
11.13
XFLT:
2.04
BGR:
1.05
XFLT:
0.77
BGR:
$34.17M
XFLT:
$127.88M
BGR:
$32.15M
XFLT:
$65.98M
BGR:
$37.24M
XFLT:
-$14.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGR vs. XFLT — Risk / Return Rank
BGR
XFLT
BGR vs. XFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGR | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.77 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | -0.67 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | -1.34 | +7.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGR vs. XFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGR drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than XFLT's maximum drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGR and XFLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGR | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.74% | -55.43% | -17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -40.67% | +26.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.25% | -47.04% | +28.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -47.04% | +22.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.51% | -38.16% | +25.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.22% | -14.49% | -5.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 20.18% | -16.25% |
Volatility
BGR vs. XFLT - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) at 3.34%. This indicates that BGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGR | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 3.34% | +3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.79% | 18.26% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 20.48% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.77% | 21.05% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 26.12% | +0.75% |
Dividends
BGR vs. XFLT - Dividend Comparison
BGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, less than XFLT's 21.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGR BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust | 7.82% | 8.62% | 6.66% | 6.22% | 4.62% | 4.75% | 9.26% | 7.84% | 8.91% | 6.57% | 6.90% | 11.93% |
XFLT XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | 21.40% | 18.23% | 15.24% | 13.61% | 13.86% | 9.82% | 10.64% | 10.63% | 11.33% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BGR vs. XFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BGR and XFLT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGR has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to XFLT (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGR dropped -72.74% vs XFLT's -55.43%.
BGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGR and XFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer