BGR vs. XFLT
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGR or XFLT.
Key characteristics
| BGR | XFLT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.64% | 10.40% |
| 1Y Return | 13.08% | 13.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 16.54% | 3.79% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.37% | 8.62% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.84 | 1.34 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.23 | 1.86 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.28 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.24 | 1.33 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.49 | 3.76 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.91% | 3.63% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.64% | 10.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.56% | -55.42% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.22% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| BGR | XFLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $361.51M | $384.44M |
| EPS | $2.00 | $1.63 |
| PE Ratio | 6.75 | 4.28 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $18.81M | $78.22M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $14.66M | $66.46M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $54.97M | $88.63M |
Correlation
The correlation between BGR and XFLT is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGR vs. XFLT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BGR achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly higher than XFLT's 10.40% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGR vs. XFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGR vs. XFLT - Dividend Comparison
BGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, less than XFLT's 14.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGR BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust | 5.98% | 6.25% | 4.64% | 4.81% | 9.28% | 7.88% | 8.96% | 6.60% | 6.93% | 11.93% | 13.83% | 16.95% |
XFLT XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | 14.59% | 13.61% | 13.86% | 9.82% | 10.64% | 10.63% | 11.33% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BGR vs. XFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGR drawdown since its inception was -72.56%, which is greater than XFLT's maximum drawdown of -55.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGR and XFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGR vs. XFLT - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) at 1.41%. This indicates that BGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BGR vs. XFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities