BGR vs. XFLT
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGR or XFLT.
Key characteristics
BGR | XFLT | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 7.58% | 3.96% |
1Y Return | 19.73% | 22.04% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 19.28% | 5.36% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 8.52% | 8.10% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.16 | 1.37 |
Daily Std Dev | 16.09% | 15.46% |
Max Drawdown | -72.56% | -55.42% |
Current Drawdown | -3.27% | -5.10% |
Fundamentals
BGR | XFLT | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $360.34M | $413.36M |
EPS | $0.69 | -$0.47 |
Revenue (TTM) | $14.59M | $0.00 |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $15.98M | $0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGR and XFLT is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGR vs. XFLT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BGR achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than XFLT's 3.96% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGR vs. XFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGR vs. XFLT - Dividend Comparison
BGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, less than XFLT's 14.41% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust | 6.01% | 6.22% | 4.62% | 4.75% | 9.26% | 7.84% | 8.91% | 6.57% | 6.90% | 11.93% | 13.78% | 16.95% |
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | 14.41% | 13.61% | 13.86% | 9.82% | 10.64% | 10.63% | 11.33% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BGR vs. XFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGR drawdown since its inception was -72.56%, which is greater than XFLT's maximum drawdown of -55.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGR and XFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGR vs. XFLT - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) at 2.52%. This indicates that BGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BGR vs. XFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities