BGR vs. XFLT
BGR (BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust) and XFLT (XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BGR in Asset Management, XFLT in Capital Markets. Over the past 5 years, BGR returned 21.22%/yr vs -3.24%/yr for XFLT. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BGR vs. XFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGR achieves a 27.65% return, which is significantly higher than XFLT's -13.70% return.
BGR
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 27.65%
- 1Y
- 35.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.36%
XFLT
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 7.09%
- 6M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -13.70%
- 1Y
- -20.33%
- 3Y*
- -4.28%
- 5Y*
- -3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.25M | $1.34M | $1.60M | |
| $2.03M | $1.89M | $1.66M |
BGR vs. XFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGR BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust | 27.65% | 17.34% | 8.07% | 5.73% | 38.90% | 40.25% | -34.78% | 23.32% | -21.21% | 5.44% |
XFLT XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | -13.70% | -15.35% | 7.37% | 30.40% | -20.30% | 31.30% | 5.13% | 22.05% | -15.10% | -4.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGR and XFLT is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017 | 0.19 |
The correlation between BGR and XFLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BGR:
$421.30M
XFLT:
$286.49M
BGR:
$2.14
XFLT:
-$3.38
BGR:
12.33
XFLT:
2.24
BGR:
1.17
XFLT:
0.84
BGR:
$34.17M
XFLT:
$127.88M
BGR:
$32.15M
XFLT:
$65.98M
BGR:
$37.24M
XFLT:
-$14.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGR vs. XFLT — Risk / Return Rank
BGR
XFLT
BGR vs. XFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGR | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.84 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | -0.51 | +2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | -0.93 | +7.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGR vs. XFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGR drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than XFLT's maximum drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGR and XFLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGR | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.74% | -55.43% | -17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.50% | -40.67% | +26.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.25% | -47.04% | +28.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -47.04% | +22.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -31.38% | +28.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.16% | -14.75% | -5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 22.13% | -17.25% |
Volatility
BGR vs. XFLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust (BGR) is 5.35%, while XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that BGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGR | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 6.27% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.79% | 18.99% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.61% | 21.36% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 20.94% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 26.06% | +0.79% |
Dividends
BGR vs. XFLT - Dividend Comparison
BGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, less than XFLT's 18.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGR BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust | 7.05% | 8.62% | 6.66% | 6.22% | 4.62% | 4.75% | 9.26% | 7.84% | 8.91% | 6.57% | 6.90% | 11.93% |
XFLT XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | 18.87% | 18.23% | 15.24% | 13.61% | 13.86% | 9.82% | 10.64% | 10.63% | 11.33% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BGR vs. XFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Energy and Resources Trust and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BGR and XFLT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XFLT has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to BGR (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGR dropped -72.74% vs XFLT's -55.43%.
BGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGR and XFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer