PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIGIX vs. CVGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIGIX vs. CVGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIGIX achieves a 33.67% return, which is significantly higher than CVGRX's 9.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CIGIX has underperformed CVGRX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while CVGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.


CIGIX

1D
-0.65%
1M
10.79%
YTD
33.67%
6M
36.88%
1Y
46.35%
3Y*
25.42%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
10.39%

CVGRX

1D
-1.39%
1M
4.79%
YTD
9.58%
6M
8.63%
1Y
25.39%
3Y*
23.68%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIGIX vs. CVGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
33.67%23.11%12.51%15.33%-30.54%-8.98%44.95%29.69%-20.93%39.54%
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
9.58%16.08%32.32%37.64%-33.33%23.06%32.97%31.11%-6.14%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CIGIX and CVGRX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2005

0.80

The correlation between CIGIX and CVGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIGIX vs. CVGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIGIX
CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CVGRX
CVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIGIX vs. CVGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIGIXCVGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.65

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

6.20

+4.87

CIGIX vs. CVGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the CVGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIGIX and CVGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIGIXCVGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.60

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.56

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.68

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.51

-0.13

Drawdowns

CIGIX vs. CVGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIGIX drawdown since its inception was -64.46%, roughly equal to the maximum CVGRX drawdown of -61.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGIX and CVGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIGIXCVGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.46%

-61.65%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.88%

-16.00%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-23.81%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.15%

-37.43%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.15%

-37.43%

-12.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-1.50%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.29%

-11.50%

-3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

4.26%

+0.02%

Volatility

CIGIX vs. CVGRX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) at 4.04%. This indicates that CIGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIGIXCVGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

4.04%

+5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

12.79%

+6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.80%

16.54%

+6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

21.82%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

21.61%

-1.63%

CIGIX vs. CVGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIGIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CVGRX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIGIX vs. CVGRX - Dividend Comparison

CIGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.09%, more than CVGRX's 8.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
10.09%13.49%4.54%0.28%0.00%0.33%5.42%0.00%13.25%3.76%0.00%0.13%
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
8.04%8.81%6.66%4.48%0.00%12.17%11.25%9.71%16.86%13.75%4.12%35.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIGIX and CVGRX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGIX has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to CVGRX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIGIX dropped -64.46% vs CVGRX's -61.65%.

CIGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIGIX and CVGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer