CVGRX vs. EFT
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT).
CVGRX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CVGRX or EFT.
Correlation
The correlation between CVGRX and EFT is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CVGRX vs. EFT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CVGRX:
1.73
EFT:
1.79
CVGRX:
2.29
EFT:
2.50
CVGRX:
1.32
EFT:
1.35
CVGRX:
0.59
EFT:
3.00
CVGRX:
9.93
EFT:
11.07
CVGRX:
3.02%
EFT:
1.54%
CVGRX:
17.28%
EFT:
9.54%
CVGRX:
-69.30%
EFT:
-60.58%
CVGRX:
-31.84%
EFT:
-1.26%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVGRX achieves a 34.16% return, which is significantly higher than EFT's 15.94% return. Over the past 10 years, CVGRX has underperformed EFT with an annualized return of 1.56%, while EFT has yielded a comparatively higher 7.08% annualized return.
CVGRX
34.16%
2.75%
10.98%
34.20%
9.00%
1.56%
EFT
15.94%
0.17%
4.05%
15.92%
7.93%
7.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CVGRX vs. EFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CVGRX vs. EFT - Dividend Comparison
CVGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.75%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVGRX Calamos Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | 9.75% | 11.09% | 9.14% | 5.26% | 5.40% | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.26% | 5.54% | 7.17% | 5.82% | 6.62% |
Drawdowns
CVGRX vs. EFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVGRX drawdown since its inception was -69.30%, which is greater than EFT's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVGRX and EFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CVGRX vs. EFT - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) at 1.76%. This indicates that CVGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.