CIGIX vs. CSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ).
CIGIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 15, 2005. CSQ is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 26, 2004.
Performance
CIGIX vs. CSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIGIX vs. CSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund | -1.22% | 23.11% | 12.51% | 15.33% | -30.54% | -8.98% | 44.95% | 29.69% | -20.93% | 39.54% |
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | -9.64% | 16.25% | 28.11% | 20.80% | -24.26% | 30.77% | 26.22% | 38.62% | -4.89% | 27.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIGIX achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly higher than CSQ's -9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CIGIX has underperformed CSQ with an annualized return of 7.46%, while CSQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.80% annualized return.
CIGIX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -15.50%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -2.15%
- 1Y
- 21.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
CSQ
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -9.32%
- YTD
- -9.64%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIGIX vs. CSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIGIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CSQ's 2.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIGIX vs. CSQ — Risk / Return Rank
CIGIX
CSQ
CIGIX vs. CSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIGIX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.65 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 1.01 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 0.83 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 3.29 | +1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIGIX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.65 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.38 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.65 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.39 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIGIX and CSQ is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CIGIX vs. CSQ - Dividend Comparison
CIGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.65%, more than CSQ's 7.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund | 13.65% | 13.49% | 4.54% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 5.42% | 0.00% | 13.25% | 3.76% | 0.00% | 0.13% |
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | 7.54% | 6.51% | 6.95% | 8.27% | 9.17% | 6.38% | 7.03% | 7.14% | 9.35% | 8.20% | 9.64% | 10.00% |
Drawdowns
CIGIX vs. CSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIGIX drawdown since its inception was -64.46%, roughly equal to the maximum CSQ drawdown of -67.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGIX and CSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIGIX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.46% | -67.17% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.88% | -15.59% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.15% | -33.09% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.15% | -48.21% | -1.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.88% | -12.07% | -3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.40% | -9.40% | -6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 3.94% | +0.22% |
Volatility
CIGIX vs. CSQ - Volatility Comparison
Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a higher volatility of 10.44% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) at 6.85%. This indicates that CIGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIGIX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.44% | 6.85% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.47% | 11.54% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.23% | 21.12% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 20.00% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 22.93% | -3.39% |