PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFR vs. SLNH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIFR vs. SLNH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and Soluna Holdings, Inc. (SLNH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 39.16% return, which is significantly higher than SLNH's 16.24% return.


CIFR

1D
16.97%
1M
-29.61%
6M
9.26%
YTD
39.16%
1Y
222.96%
3Y*
67.89%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.38%

SLNH

1D
20.35%
1M
-20.93%
6M
-18.56%
YTD
16.24%
1Y
115.87%
3Y*
-38.34%
5Y*
-62.23%
10Y*
-19.03%
ALL TIME*
-9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFR vs. SLNH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CIFR
Cipher Digital Inc.
39.16%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.65%
SLNH
Soluna Holdings, Inc.
16.24%-44.29%-47.50%-38.67%-97.58%8.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFR and SLNH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021

0.40

The correlation between CIFR and SLNH shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIFR:

$8.40B

SLNH:

$214.54M

EPS

CIFR:

-$2.32

SLNH:

-$1.36

PS Ratio

CIFR:

45.51

SLNH:

1.91

PB Ratio

CIFR:

11.65

SLNH:

2.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIFR:

$174.98M

SLNH:

$33.18M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIFR:

-$172.84M

SLNH:

$28.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIFR:

-$169.22M

SLNH:

-$25.84M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFR vs. SLNH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SLNH
SLNH Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SLNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLNH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SLNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLNH Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFR vs. SLNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and Soluna Holdings, Inc. (SLNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIFRSLNHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

1.35

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

1.95

+6.50

CIFR vs. SLNH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the SLNH Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and SLNH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. SLNH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum SLNH drawdown of -99.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and SLNH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFRSLNHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-99.90%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.38%

-86.26%

+34.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.74%

-95.57%

+23.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.61%

-99.67%

+70.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.31%

-57.33%

-7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.50%

59.54%

-33.04%

Volatility

CIFR vs. SLNH - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and Soluna Holdings, Inc. (SLNH) have volatilities of 33.12% and 34.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFRSLNHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.12%

34.39%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.07%

101.67%

-27.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.94%

195.09%

-84.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.73%

144.59%

-22.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.73%

129.04%

-7.31%

Dividends

CIFR vs. SLNH - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor SLNH has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CIFR
Cipher Digital Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLNH
Soluna Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%110.45%

Financials

CIFR vs. SLNH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Digital Inc. and Soluna Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
9.39M
(CIFR) Total Revenue
(SLNH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CIFR and SLNH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLNH has higher volatility (34.39%) compared to CIFR (33.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIFR dropped -97.16% vs SLNH's -99.90%.

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFR and SLNH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer