CIFR vs. QVCGA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CIFR (Cipher Digital Inc.) and QVCGA (QVC Group Inc) are both stocks. CIFR operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while QVCGA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical).

Performance

CIFR vs. QVCGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CIFR

• 1D: 8.26%
• 1M: 20.51%
• YTD: 65.99%
• 6M: 43.70%
• 1Y: 558.60%
• 3Y*: 113.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QVCGA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFR vs. QVCGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CIFR Cipher Digital Inc.	-2.62%
QVCGA QVC Group Inc	0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CIFR : $9.93B QVCGA : $2.75M
EPS CIFR : -$2.33 QVCGA : -$302.09
PS Ratio CIFR : 53.84 QVCGA : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) CIFR : $174.98M QVCGA : $9.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) CIFR : -$172.84M QVCGA : $2.89B
EBITDA (TTM) CIFR : -$169.22M QVCGA : $789.00M

Return for Risk

CIFR vs. QVCGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFR

CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 96
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

QVCGA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFR vs. QVCGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIFR	QVCGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.19	—	—

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. QVCGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than QVCGA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and QVCGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIFR	QVCGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.16%	0.00%	-97.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-71.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.81%	0.00%	-6.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.24%	0.00%	-66.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CIFR	QVCGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.30%	0.00%	+109.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.97%	0.00%	+121.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.97%	0.00%	+121.97%

Dividends

CIFR vs. QVCGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor QVCGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials