PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFR vs. NSSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIFR vs. NSSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 64.57% return, which is significantly higher than NSSC's -15.75% return.


CIFR

1D
8.20%
1M
18.20%
YTD
64.57%
6M
24.69%
1Y
522.82%
3Y*
119.40%
5Y*
10Y*

NSSC

1D
0.14%
1M
-14.23%
YTD
-15.75%
6M
-16.27%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
-1.47%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
27.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFR vs. NSSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
64.57%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.92%
NSSC
Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
-15.75%19.22%4.97%25.59%9.96%29.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFR and NSSC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIFR:

$9.84B

NSSC:

$1.25B

EPS

CIFR:

-$2.33

NSSC:

$1.03

PS Ratio

CIFR:

53.38

NSSC:

6.38

PB Ratio

CIFR:

13.78

NSSC:

7.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIFR:

$174.98M

NSSC:

$197.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIFR:

-$172.84M

NSSC:

$112.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIFR:

-$169.22M

NSSC:

$42.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFR vs. NSSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NSSC
NSSC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NSSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NSSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFR vs. NSSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIFRNSSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.14

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.27

0.91

+9.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.60

2.57

+18.02

CIFR vs. NSSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 4.86, which is higher than the NSSC Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and NSSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIFRNSSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.86

0.55

+4.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.20

-0.04

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. NSSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum NSSC drawdown of -93.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and NSSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFRNSSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-93.20%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.38%

-25.72%

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.74%

-65.43%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.61%

-38.00%

+30.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.47%

-38.20%

-28.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.55%

9.05%

+16.50%

Volatility

CIFR vs. NSSC - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 27.70% compared to Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) at 10.56%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFRNSSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.70%

10.56%

+17.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.95%

32.22%

+38.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.62%

42.20%

+66.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

122.03%

51.07%

+70.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

122.03%

49.57%

+72.46%

Dividends

CIFR vs. NSSC - Dividend Comparison

CIFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NSSC
Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
1.63%1.31%1.27%0.65%

Financials

CIFR vs. NSSC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and Napco Security Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M202220232024202520260
49.17M
(CIFR) Total Revenue
(NSSC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CIFR and NSSC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIFR has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to NSSC (10.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIFR dropped -97.16% vs NSSC's -93.20%.

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFR and NSSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer