CIFR vs. MBX
CIFR (Cipher Mining Inc.) and MBX (MBX Biosciences, Inc) are both stocks. CIFR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while MBX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past year, CIFR returned 522.82% vs 155.06% for MBX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CIFR vs. MBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 64.57% return, which is significantly higher than MBX's -8.05% return.
CIFR
- 1D
- 8.20%
- 1M
- 18.20%
- YTD
- 64.57%
- 6M
- 24.69%
- 1Y
- 522.82%
- 3Y*
- 119.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBX
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- -29.21%
- YTD
- -8.05%
- 6M
- -7.61%
- 1Y
- 155.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFR vs. MBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 64.57% | 218.10% | 50.16% |
MBX MBX Biosciences, Inc | -8.05% | 71.13% | -22.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFR and MBX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
CIFR:
$9.84B
MBX:
$1.35B
CIFR:
-$2.33
MBX:
-$2.30
CIFR:
13.78
MBX:
3.09
CIFR:
$174.98M
MBX:
$0.00
CIFR:
-$172.84M
MBX:
-$160.00K
CIFR:
-$169.22M
MBX:
-$96.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFR vs. MBX — Risk / Return Rank
CIFR
MBX
CIFR vs. MBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) and MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIFR | MBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.33 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.27 | 4.15 | +6.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.60 | 7.99 | +12.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIFR | MBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.86 | 1.17 | +3.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.11 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
CIFR vs. MBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than MBX's maximum drawdown of -77.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and MBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFR | MBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -77.71% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.38% | -37.60% | -13.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.61% | -32.78% | +25.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.47% | -35.04% | -31.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.55% | 19.50% | +6.05% |
Volatility
CIFR vs. MBX - Volatility Comparison
Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 27.70% compared to MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX) at 23.40%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFR | MBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.70% | 23.40% | +4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.95% | 57.78% | +13.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.62% | 133.96% | -25.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 122.03% | 118.74% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.03% | 118.74% | +3.29% |
Dividends
CIFR vs. MBX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFR nor MBX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CIFR vs. MBX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Mining Inc. and MBX Biosciences, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFR and MBX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIFR has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to MBX (23.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIFR dropped -97.16% vs MBX's -77.71%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIFR and MBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer