PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFR vs. BTDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIFR vs. BTDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 47.22% return, which is significantly higher than BTDR's 27.12% return.


CIFR

1D
8.43%
1M
-3.21%
6M
19.66%
YTD
47.22%
1Y
259.17%
3Y*
79.94%
5Y*
10Y*

BTDR

1D
2.89%
1M
-18.43%
6M
14.18%
YTD
27.12%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFR vs. BTDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CIFR
Cipher Digital Inc.
47.22%218.10%12.35%75.00%
BTDR
Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares
27.12%-48.27%119.78%20.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFR and BTDR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2023

0.58

The correlation between CIFR and BTDR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIFR:

$8.89B

BTDR:

$3.33B

EPS

CIFR:

-$2.32

BTDR:

-$2.13

PS Ratio

CIFR:

48.15

BTDR:

4.56

PB Ratio

CIFR:

12.33

BTDR:

4.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIFR:

$174.98M

BTDR:

$739.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIFR:

-$172.84M

BTDR:

$25.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIFR:

-$169.22M

BTDR:

$59.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFR vs. BTDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BTDR
BTDR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BTDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTDR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BTDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTDR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFR vs. BTDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIFRBTDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.09

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.08

0.05

+5.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.10

0.08

+10.02

CIFR vs. BTDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the BTDR Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and BTDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. BTDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than BTDR's maximum drawdown of -79.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and BTDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFRBTDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-79.52%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.38%

-71.89%

+20.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.74%

-79.52%

+7.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.53%

-45.40%

+19.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.60%

-43.49%

-22.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.79%

43.57%

-17.78%

Volatility

CIFR vs. BTDR - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 31.53% compared to Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) at 24.76%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFRBTDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.53%

24.76%

+6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.34%

69.04%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.54%

99.92%

+8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.69%

122.59%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.69%

122.59%

-0.90%

Dividends

CIFR vs. BTDR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIFR nor BTDR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CIFR vs. BTDR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Digital Inc. and Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
188.93M
(CIFR) Total Revenue
(BTDR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CIFR and BTDR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIFR has higher volatility (31.53%) compared to BTDR (24.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIFR dropped -97.16% vs BTDR's -79.52%.

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFR and BTDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer