CIF vs. VWEHX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares (VWEHX).
CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988. VWEHX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 27, 1978.
Performance
CIF vs. VWEHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIF vs. VWEHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -1.00% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
VWEHX Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares | -1.15% | 9.38% | 6.33% | 11.66% | -9.04% | 2.97% | 5.30% | 15.81% | -2.93% | 7.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly higher than VWEHX's -1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF has outperformed VWEHX with an annualized return of 6.30%, while VWEHX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.18% annualized return.
CIF
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -2.74%
- 1Y
- 7.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
VWEHX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 6.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF vs. VWEHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VWEHX's 0.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIF vs. VWEHX — Risk / Return Rank
CIF
VWEHX
CIF vs. VWEHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares (VWEHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIF | VWEHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 1.90 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 2.86 | -2.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.46 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 2.79 | -2.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | 11.37 | -8.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIF | VWEHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 1.90 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.80 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.99 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.87 | -0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF and VWEHX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CIF vs. VWEHX - Dividend Comparison
CIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than VWEHX's 5.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.82% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
VWEHX Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares | 5.78% | 6.15% | 6.11% | 5.68% | 5.11% | 3.43% | 4.62% | 5.24% | 5.94% | 5.29% | 5.41% | 6.42% |
Drawdowns
CIF vs. VWEHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, which is greater than VWEHX's maximum drawdown of -30.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF and VWEHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIF | VWEHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -30.17% | -39.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -2.52% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -13.83% | -31.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -19.69% | -25.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.34% | -1.80% | -20.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.80% | -4.30% | -13.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 0.62% | +2.01% |
Volatility
CIF vs. VWEHX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Investor Shares (VWEHX) at 1.39%. This indicates that CIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWEHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIF | VWEHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 1.39% | +3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 2.29% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 3.45% | +10.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 4.85% | +12.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 5.26% | +14.17% |