CIF vs. VWEAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Admiral Shares (VWEAX).
CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988. VWEAX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001.
Performance
CIF vs. VWEAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIF vs. VWEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
VWEAX Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Admiral Shares | -1.14% | 9.49% | 6.42% | 11.79% | -8.95% | 3.04% | 5.41% | 15.92% | -2.80% | 7.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than VWEAX's -1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF has outperformed VWEAX with an annualized return of 6.17%, while VWEAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.28% annualized return.
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
VWEAX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 5.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF vs. VWEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VWEAX's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIF vs. VWEAX — Risk / Return Rank
CIF
VWEAX
CIF vs. VWEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Admiral Shares (VWEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIF | VWEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.92 | -1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 2.90 | -2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.47 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 2.83 | -2.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 11.54 | -9.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIF | VWEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.92 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.82 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 1.01 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 1.22 | -1.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF and VWEAX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CIF vs. VWEAX - Dividend Comparison
CIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than VWEAX's 5.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
VWEAX Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Admiral Shares | 5.88% | 6.25% | 6.20% | 5.79% | 5.21% | 3.49% | 4.71% | 5.33% | 6.07% | 5.39% | 5.51% | 6.53% |
Drawdowns
CIF vs. VWEAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, which is greater than VWEAX's maximum drawdown of -30.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF and VWEAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIF | VWEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -30.05% | -39.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -2.52% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -13.77% | -31.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -19.68% | -25.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.30% | -1.80% | -21.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.80% | -2.13% | -15.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 0.62% | +2.03% |
Volatility
CIF vs. VWEAX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Fund Admiral Shares (VWEAX) at 1.39%. This indicates that CIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIF | VWEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 1.39% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 2.31% | +5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 3.46% | +9.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 4.86% | +11.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 5.27% | +14.16% |