CIF vs. SCFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX).
CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988. SCFIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012.
Performance
CIF vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIF vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -1.00% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | -0.71% | 7.02% | 6.11% | 9.24% | -2.52% | 5.08% | 3.36% | 7.61% | 0.85% | 3.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than SCFIX's -0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF has outperformed SCFIX with an annualized return of 6.30%, while SCFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.29% annualized return.
CIF
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -2.74%
- 1Y
- 7.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
SCFIX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.24%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIF vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
CIF
SCFIX
CIF vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIF | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 2.54 | -2.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 3.61 | -2.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.62 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 3.04 | -2.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | 15.57 | -13.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIF | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 2.54 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 1.58 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 1.32 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 1.29 | -1.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF and SCFIX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CIF vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison
CIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than SCFIX's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.82% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 5.00% | 5.54% | 5.85% | 5.21% | 3.86% | 4.93% | 3.24% | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.09% | 3.07% | 3.38% |
Drawdowns
CIF vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF and SCFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIF | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -13.08% | -56.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -1.63% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -6.30% | -38.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -13.08% | -32.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.34% | -1.11% | -21.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.80% | -0.52% | -17.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 0.32% | +2.31% |
Volatility
CIF vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that CIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIF | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 0.79% | +4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 1.19% | +6.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 1.96% | +11.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 2.92% | +13.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 3.27% | +16.16% |