CIF vs. MINIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX).
CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988. MINIX is managed by MFS.
Performance
CIF vs. MINIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIF vs. MINIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | -3.26% | 33.06% | 7.35% | 18.04% | -23.05% | 10.55% | 20.45% | 25.90% | -9.02% | 27.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly higher than MINIX's -3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF has underperformed MINIX with an annualized return of 6.17%, while MINIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.57% annualized return.
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
MINIX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -11.89%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF vs. MINIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MINIX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIF vs. MINIX — Risk / Return Rank
CIF
MINIX
CIF vs. MINIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIF | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.12 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 1.52 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.22 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 1.33 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 5.28 | -3.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIF | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.12 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.44 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.62 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.55 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF and MINIX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CIF vs. MINIX - Dividend Comparison
CIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than MINIX's 8.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | 8.03% | 7.77% | 12.02% | 11.21% | 13.90% | 7.25% | 5.25% | 3.94% | 4.49% | 2.62% | 1.82% | 3.20% |
Drawdowns
CIF vs. MINIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, which is greater than MINIX's maximum drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF and MINIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIF | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -51.72% | -17.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -12.42% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -36.78% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -36.78% | -8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.30% | -11.89% | -11.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.80% | -8.64% | -9.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 3.13% | -0.48% |
Volatility
CIF vs. MINIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) is 5.35%, while MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that CIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIF | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 5.98% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 10.11% | -2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 15.74% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 16.45% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 15.52% | +3.91% |