CIF vs. MEIKX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX).
CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988. MEIKX is managed by MFS. It was launched on May 1, 2006.
Performance
CIF vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIF vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
MEIKX MFS Value Fund | -0.52% | 13.37% | 11.98% | 8.32% | -5.92% | 25.59% | 4.09% | 30.18% | -9.81% | 17.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than MEIKX's -0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF has underperformed MEIKX with an annualized return of 6.17%, while MEIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
MEIKX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIF vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank
CIF
MEIKX
CIF vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIF | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.66 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 0.99 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.14 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 0.79 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 3.49 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIF | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.66 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.60 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.60 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.39 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF and MEIKX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CIF vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison
CIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than MEIKX's 9.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
MEIKX MFS Value Fund | 9.98% | 9.72% | 9.49% | 8.58% | 7.77% | 3.43% | 2.75% | 3.28% | 3.76% | 4.14% | 3.84% | 6.12% |
Drawdowns
CIF vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, which is greater than MEIKX's maximum drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF and MEIKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIF | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -56.81% | -12.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -11.09% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -17.50% | -27.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -36.68% | -8.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.30% | -6.54% | -16.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.80% | -9.51% | -8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.50% | +0.15% |
Volatility
CIF vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) at 3.12%. This indicates that CIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIF | MEIKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 3.12% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 7.68% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 14.77% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 13.90% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 16.55% | +2.88% |