CIF vs. FOCIX
CIF (MFS Intermediate High Income Fund) and FOCIX (Fairholme Focused Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, CIF returned 5.43%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for FOCIX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIF charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FOCIX.
Performance
CIF vs. FOCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than FOCIX's 6.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF has underperformed FOCIX with an annualized return of 5.43%, while FOCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.02% annualized return.
CIF
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- -3.54%
- 10Y*
- 5.43%
FOCIX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.02%
CIF vs. FOCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -0.83% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
FOCIX Fairholme Focused Income Fund | 6.37% | 6.17% | 14.67% | 12.58% | 6.00% | 6.73% | 0.99% | 7.44% | -6.88% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF and FOCIX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010 | 0.22 |
The correlation between CIF and FOCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIF vs. FOCIX — Risk / Return Rank
CIF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FOCIX
CIF vs. FOCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIF | FOCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.24 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 2.94 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 8.23 | -6.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIF vs. FOCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, which is greater than FOCIX's maximum drawdown of -18.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF and FOCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIF | FOCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -18.78% | -50.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -3.33% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.73% | -7.96% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -12.36% | -32.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -18.61% | -26.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.22% | -2.72% | -19.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.82% | -4.76% | -13.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 1.19% | +1.69% |
Volatility
CIF vs. FOCIX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX) at 2.41%. This indicates that CIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIF | FOCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 2.41% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 5.68% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 7.44% | +2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 9.74% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 9.08% | +10.35% |
CIF vs. FOCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCIX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIF vs. FOCIX - Dividend Comparison
CIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FOCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.87% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
FOCIX Fairholme Focused Income Fund | 1.23% | 1.31% | 2.46% | 2.82% | 2.24% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 4.57% | 9.83% | 5.16% | 5.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIF and FOCIX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIF has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to FOCIX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIF dropped -69.23% vs FOCIX's -18.78%.
FOCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIF and FOCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer