PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIEN vs. TT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIEN vs. TT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIEN achieves a 90.70% return, which is significantly higher than TT's 18.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CIEN has outperformed TT with an annualized return of 35.80%, while TT has yielded a comparatively lower 23.76% annualized return.


CIEN

1D
0.17%
1M
-22.83%
YTD
90.70%
6M
104.17%
1Y
501.62%
3Y*
119.10%
5Y*
49.92%
10Y*
35.80%

TT

1D
-0.41%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
18.29%
6M
17.69%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
37.71%
5Y*
21.39%
10Y*
23.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIEN vs. TT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
90.70%175.76%88.42%-11.71%-33.77%45.64%23.80%25.89%62.02%-14.26%
TT
Trane Technologies plc
18.29%6.38%52.97%47.39%-15.34%41.02%11.26%48.32%4.41%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CIEN and TT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 1997

0.35

The correlation between CIEN and TT shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIEN:

$65.25B

TT:

$102.24B

EPS

CIEN:

$3.01

TT:

$12.94

PE Ratio

CIEN:

148.07

TT:

35.43

PS Ratio

CIEN:

11.65

TT:

4.75

PB Ratio

CIEN:

22.56

TT:

11.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIEN:

$5.57B

TT:

$21.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIEN:

$2.40B

TT:

$7.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

CIEN:

$670.55M

TT:

$4.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIEN vs. TT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIEN
CIEN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TT
TT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
TT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIEN vs. TT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIENTTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.08

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.49

0.45

+16.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

76.44

0.89

+75.55

CIEN vs. TT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIEN Sharpe Ratio is 7.58, which is higher than the TT Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIEN and TT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIEN vs. TT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIEN drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than TT's maximum drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIEN and TT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIENTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.51%

-77.91%

-21.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.68%

-19.97%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.51%

-24.44%

-21.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.54%

-40.53%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-51.13%

+1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.38%

-6.75%

-50.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.08%

-14.83%

-72.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

10.12%

-3.51%

Volatility

CIEN vs. TT - Volatility Comparison

Ciena Corporation (CIEN) has a higher volatility of 24.81% compared to Trane Technologies plc (TT) at 9.05%. This indicates that CIEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIENTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.81%

9.05%

+15.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.12%

21.82%

+34.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.74%

27.50%

+39.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.55%

27.38%

+21.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.35%

28.34%

+16.01%

Dividends

CIEN vs. TT - Dividend Comparison

CIEN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TT
Trane Technologies plc
0.87%0.97%0.91%1.23%1.59%1.17%1.46%1.59%2.15%1.91%1.81%2.10%

Financials

CIEN vs. TT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ciena Corporation and Trane Technologies plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
1.57B
4.97B
(CIEN) Total Revenue
(TT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CIEN vs. TT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ciena Corporation and Trane Technologies plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
44.0%
34.8%
Portfolio components
CIEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a gross profit of 691.55M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

TT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

CIEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported an operating income of 237.87M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

TT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

CIEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a net income of 218.22M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.

TT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIEN and TT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIEN has higher volatility (24.81%) compared to TT (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIEN dropped -99.51% vs TT's -77.91%.

CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.58 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIEN and TT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer