CICVX vs. CTSIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CICVX (Calamos Convertible Fund) and CTSIX (Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - CICVX is a Convertible Bonds fund managed by Calamos, while CTSIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Calamos. Over the past 5 years, CICVX returned 6.51%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for CTSIX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CICVX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CTSIX.

Performance

CICVX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CICVX achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 18.97% return.

CICVX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -3.10%
• 6M: 11.13%
• YTD: 17.82%
• 1Y: 29.67%
• 3Y*: 15.94%
• 5Y*: 6.51%
• 10Y*: 11.54%
• ALL TIME*: 4.28%

CTSIX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -9.89%
• 6M: 18.17%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 1Y: 39.64%
• 3Y*: 27.12%
• 5Y*: 7.31%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CICVX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund	17.82%	19.03%	9.94%	10.95%	-21.02%	5.36%	48.84%	8.79%
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	18.97%	25.90%	44.34%	7.57%	-37.30%	9.12%	63.38%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CICVX and CTSIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019	0.88

The correlation between CICVX and CTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CICVX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CICVX

CICVX Risk / Return Rank: 67
CICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
CICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

CTSIX

CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CICVX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CICVX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.21	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	1.75	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.22	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	2.08	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	8.64	+1.64

CICVX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CICVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICVX and CTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CICVX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICVX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, roughly equal to the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICVX and CTSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CICVX	CTSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.33%	-50.83%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.15%	-17.99%	+7.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.79%	-28.40%	+13.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.17%	-50.60%	+23.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.23%	-15.14%	+7.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.40%	-20.30%	+2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	4.33%	-1.60%

Volatility

CICVX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) is 6.09%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that CICVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CICVX	CTSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	10.46%	-4.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	25.51%	-11.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.06%	30.95%	-13.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.38%	28.60%	-15.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	30.01%	-16.89%

CICVX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CICVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CICVX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

CICVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.58%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund	10.58%	12.51%	1.83%	2.48%	0.94%	15.90%	7.74%	1.39%	16.75%	4.55%	3.43%	5.41%
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.77%	4.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CICVX and CTSIX in my portfolio?

CICVX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CICVX or CTSIX?

CTSIX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to CICVX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CICVX dropped -49.33% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.