ACGBY vs. CVS
ACGBY (Agricultural Bank of China PK) and CVS (CVS Health Corporation) are both stocks. ACGBY operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while CVS operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, ACGBY returned 16.76%/yr vs 2.96%/yr for CVS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACGBY vs. CVS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACGBY achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly lower than CVS's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGBY has outperformed CVS with an annualized return of 16.76%, while CVS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.96% annualized return.
ACGBY
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 39.05%
- 5Y*
- 24.09%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
CVS
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- 17.51%
- YTD
- 21.52%
- 6M
- 25.65%
- 1Y
- 54.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
ACGBY vs. CVS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGBY Agricultural Bank of China PK | 2.85% | 43.43% | 65.14% | 24.56% | 8.26% | 0.75% | -13.39% | 6.94% | -3.48% | 28.00% |
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 21.52% | 84.35% | -40.77% | -12.53% | -7.63% | 54.87% | -5.14% | 17.26% | -7.04% | -5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACGBY and CVS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2011 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
ACGBY:
$278.64B
CVS:
$121.27B
ACGBY:
$19.70
CVS:
$2.30
ACGBY:
0.94
CVS:
41.19
ACGBY:
0.20
CVS:
0.30
ACGBY:
0.09
CVS:
1.57
ACGBY:
$1.37T
CVS:
$407.91B
ACGBY:
$743.81B
CVS:
$56.59B
ACGBY:
$324.72B
CVS:
$9.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACGBY vs. CVS — Risk / Return Rank
ACGBY
CVS
ACGBY vs. CVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agricultural Bank of China PK (ACGBY) and CVS Health Corporation (CVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACGBY | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 3.34 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 8.59 | -6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACGBY | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.77 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.18 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.10 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.33 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ACGBY vs. CVS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACGBY drawdown since its inception was -52.60%, smaller than the maximum CVS drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGBY and CVS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACGBY | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.60% | -64.07% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.52% | -16.44% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.00% | -43.98% | +24.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.86% | -56.79% | +34.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.69% | -56.79% | +13.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -3.35% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.59% | -19.55% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.45% | 6.37% | +2.08% |
Volatility
ACGBY vs. CVS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Agricultural Bank of China PK (ACGBY) is 6.59%, while CVS Health Corporation (CVS) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that ACGBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACGBY | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 11.22% | -4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.89% | 26.20% | -10.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.68% | 31.00% | -8.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 29.96% | -7.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 29.29% | -5.51% |
Dividends
ACGBY vs. CVS - Dividend Comparison
ACGBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, more than CVS's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGBY Agricultural Bank of China PK | 7.18% | 6.83% | 10.53% | 8.42% | 9.62% | 6.83% | 5.86% | 4.84% | 5.45% | 10.15% | 11.73% | 6.06% |
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 2.81% | 3.35% | 5.93% | 3.06% | 2.36% | 1.94% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.76% | 2.15% | 1.43% |
Financials
ACGBY vs. CVS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agricultural Bank of China PK and CVS Health Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACGBY vs. CVS - Profitability Comparison
ACGBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agricultural Bank of China PK reported a gross profit of 206.24B and revenue of 358.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.
CVS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.62B and revenue of 100.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.
ACGBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agricultural Bank of China PK reported an operating income of 78.67B and revenue of 358.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.
CVS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported an operating income of 4.68B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
ACGBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agricultural Bank of China PK reported a net income of 75.19B and revenue of 358.48B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.
CVS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a net income of 2.94B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACGBY and CVS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVS has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to ACGBY (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGBY dropped -52.60% vs CVS's -64.07%.
CVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACGBY and CVS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer