CIAI.TO vs. XEXP.TO
CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and XEXP.TO (iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CIAI.TO is actively managed, while XEXP.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, CIAI.TO returned 63.98% vs 41.18% for XEXP.TO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIAI.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for XEXP.TO.
Performance
CIAI.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIAI.TO achieves a 31.59% return, which is significantly higher than XEXP.TO's 21.53% return.
CIAI.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 31.59%
- 6M
- 26.69%
- 1Y
- 63.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEXP.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 11.43%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 41.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIAI.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 31.59% | 18.84% | 29.92% |
XEXP.TO iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF | 21.53% | 13.97% | 8.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIAI.TO and XEXP.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2024 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIAI.TO vs. XEXP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CIAI.TO
XEXP.TO
CIAI.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIAI.TO | XEXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 3.42 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.79 | 10.64 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIAI.TO | XEXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.51 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.92 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
CIAI.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, which is greater than XEXP.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and XEXP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIAI.TO | XEXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -22.44% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.93% | -12.10% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -3.99% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 3.88% | +2.67% |
Volatility
CIAI.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP.TO) at 5.54%. This indicates that CIAI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEXP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIAI.TO | XEXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 5.54% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.43% | 12.89% | +5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 16.48% | +7.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.40% | 18.92% | +9.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.40% | 18.92% | +9.48% |
CIAI.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIAI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XEXP.TO's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIAI.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Dividend Comparison
CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEXP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEXP.TO iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.80% | 0.63% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIAI.TO and XEXP.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEXP.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEXP.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CIAI.TO.
They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CIAI.TO and 0.44% for XEXP.TO.
Find the right allocation for CIAI.TO and XEXP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer