CIAI.TO vs. TLF.TO
CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CIAI.TO returned 33.36% vs 32.76% for TLF.TO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
CIAI.TO vs. TLF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIAI.TO achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than TLF.TO's 21.68% return.
CIAI.TO
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- 6M
- 13.47%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLF.TO
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- 6M
- 18.82%
- YTD
- 21.68%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 21.23%
CIAI.TO vs. TLF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 19.44% | 18.84% | 29.92% |
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 21.68% | 18.20% | 12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIAI.TO and TLF.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CIAI.TO and TLF.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIAI.TO vs. TLF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CIAI.TO
TLF.TO
CIAI.TO vs. TLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIAI.TO | TLF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.23 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | 7.57 | -2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIAI.TO vs. TLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, smaller than the maximum TLF.TO drawdown of -37.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and TLF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIAI.TO | TLF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -37.19% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.93% | -14.73% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.02% | -10.89% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -7.35% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 4.34% | +2.53% |
Volatility
CIAI.TO vs. TLF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) is 10.63%, while Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) has a volatility of 13.70%. This indicates that CIAI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIAI.TO | TLF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 13.70% | -3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.08% | 21.97% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.21% | 24.65% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 25.84% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 24.22% | +4.95% |
Dividends
CIAI.TO vs. TLF.TO - Dividend Comparison
CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 5.66% | 5.90% | 5.86% | 5.31% | 6.97% | 3.40% | 3.49% | 4.64% | 6.05% | 5.94% | 7.67% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIAI.TO and TLF.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and Brompton.
Find the right allocation for CIAI.TO and TLF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer